Back at university, I remember one of my teachers told me that "as for something" carries an undertone of disinterest while "as to something", less used though, is a more neutral way of refering to something.

Is she right? How about other expressions like regarding, concerning, as regards, or simply for? Which one is used most frequently or informally?

  • I think you need to give more context for this question to be understood. Perhaps a complete sentence?
    – Jay
    Commented Jul 8, 2014 at 14:33
  • 1
    I ask it in a more generalized way. I guess any sentences containing these phrases would serve the purpose, so I'd like to leave this to anyone who would answer my question. They are free to use their own as they see fit. @Jay
    – Kinzle B
    Commented Jul 8, 2014 at 14:43
  • Considering the way you wrote "As to preventing employee crime" in another question, I'd say that you mix "as to" up with "as for". One thing I think I can say about "as to" (being used at the beginning of a sentence) is it's formal. Commented Jul 8, 2014 at 15:05
  • Come to think of it, it might not be the case of a mix-up with "as for". It just sounded odd to me. Commented Jul 8, 2014 at 15:10
  • Did I? If I may ask, what's your point? @DamkerngT.
    – Kinzle B
    Commented Jul 8, 2014 at 15:11

3 Answers 3


I'm going to disagree with your teacher. While we do commonly express disinterest or disdain for something by saying as for that*, the phrase does not inherently carry those sentiments. Similarly, one could put sarcastic emphasis on as to that to express the feeling that your teacher says comes with as for that.

As with so much in English, context, stress and intonation must be known to grasp the nuances. It's entirely possible to use both as for that and as to that in a completely neutral, dismissive or even excited fashion.

I'd say that the simpler terms regarding, concerning and for are more staunchly neutral than the other two phrases. Absolutely they can all be inflected negatively or positively, but the as phrases (including as regards) naturally draw more attention because they're more verbose and come off a bit more formally (though all of these are appropriate in formal English). Because they're marginally stronger and thus set topics apart slightly more, it requires less work to shift their sentiments. Conversely, my voice would need to ooze sardonically to make it explicit how little I value the topic if I prefaced it with regarding.

In my experience, for, concerning and regarding are the most common of the terms from the question in informal registers. Though, again, they are fine for formal use. In colloquial conversation, you are also likely to encounter about [that] or [other topic], that's...; these are not formal expressions. Since informal language is more fluid and flexible, the emotions carried by these terms are also considerably more plastic.

*Aside: swap the order of the two important bits of this clause and note the drastic change in meaning! As for that is commonly said to express disdain or disinterest.


"As to" is used significantly less than "as for," and they don't necessarily mean the same thing. According to the Merriam-Webster dictionary, "as to" can be defined as:

  1. As for/About

  2. According to/By

The first of these is more frequently used than the second. Being a native English speaker, I don't recognize any difference between "as for" and "as to," but they are used in different kinds of sentences. "As for" is often used to either start a sentence or add onto a sentence:

"My wife and I are well. As for our work, it is not going well."

It can also be used (formally) to connote similarity:

"For Hawthorne, as for Borges, his writing was a reaction to his cultural situation."

As to, on the other hand, can be used in the ways stated at the beginning:

"The programmers were at a loss as to how to explain the error."


"The blocks were graded as to size and color."

"Regarding" would not typically be substituted for "as for" or "as to":

"As for the mayor, he can pay for his own dinner."

-> "Regarding the mayor, he can pay for his own dinner."

While grammatically correct, that sentence is a rather atypical form, so "as for" would still be more appropriate. However, "as for" can be defined as "regarding," even though the words aren't very interchangeable in common English. "Concerning" would be slightly more appropriate (though "as for" still sounds better):

-> "Concerning the mayor, he can pay for his own dinner."

Finally, "as regards"/"as respects" is another way of saying "in regard to" or "as compared to."

I hope that answers your question, but comment if I need to explain something better.

  • Good answer! If I may ask, does "as for something" carry an undertone of disinterest?
    – Kinzle B
    Commented Jul 8, 2014 at 15:33
  • I don't think it carries an undertone of disinterest. For example, I could say, "Everyone is eating dinner. As for me, however, I will not eat." It does show some disinterest for the action it is contradicting ("Everyone is eating dinner"), but not for the action following the "as for." Commented Jul 8, 2014 at 15:51
  • Google Books say that "as to" is used more than "as for" books.google.com/ngrams/…
    – Peter
    Commented Dec 24, 2017 at 5:10

There is a contrast, but it is subtle and not part of the meaning of the two phrases, but part of their connotation (the cultural or emotional association) that comes from how people have often used them in the past. The difference in connotation is pretty weak though, so I think your teacher was overstating the the importance of choosing one over the other.

The relevant difference is:

  • "As to [something]" has a history of more formal use.
  • "As for [something]" has a history of being used to begin a dismissive statement.

For example, two uses that magnify the connotations:

  • "As to whether we should support the idea Bob suggests, I think it would in our best interests."
  • "As for Bob's idea, I don't think it's worth considering at all. Alice's idea is much better."

This is how the two phrases are often used: to emphasise your respect for ("as to") or dismissal of ("as for") the subject. So when you use them with a neutral statement, "as to" could be understood that you are implying you respect the subject or people connected to it, while "as for" could be understood that you want to imply (without saying) that you feel dismissive of the subject:

  • "As to the mining project, it has some problems."
    (weakly implies that you feel the project is worthwhile enough that the problems should be discussed)
  • "As for the mining project, it has some problems."
    (weakly implies that you feel the problems make the project not worth doing or considering)

The implication is fairly weak though, and can easily be overridden by the tone and meaning of the surrounding sentences, or by how you write/say the rest of the sentence that starts with "as to/for":

  • "As to Bob's idea, we should probably not use it." (dismissive)
  • "As for Bob's idea, I think it has merits we should consider." (respectful)

Because the effect is fairly weak, it's also often going to be more important that one is formal and the other less formal. In a formal environment, "as to" will usually be more suitable regardless of whether you respect or disrespect the subject, while in an informal situation "as for" will be preferred so that you don't sound "stiff".

A final note: using the wrong one will not often result in a misunderstanding, because the surrounding sentences will usually more strongly communicate your attitude on the subject than the "as to/for" choice. More likely, using the "wrong" one will only result in a native reader/speaking believing that the sentence sounds awkward in context.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .