But, uh, Ross is a great guy. I was roommates with him in college.
That's from Friends episode [S06E21]. Shouldn't it be
we were roommates with him
Which sounds more natural?
English Language Learners Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for speakers of other languages learning English. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this communityBut, uh, Ross is a great guy. I was roommates with him in college.
That's from Friends episode [S06E21]. Shouldn't it be
we were roommates with him
Which sounds more natural?
When talking about a relationship we can in casual speech use a plural and say, for example "I was friends with him", or "I was roommates with him". These are possible:
Casual: Ross is a great guy. I was roommates with him in college.
More formal: Ross is a great guy. We were roommates in college.
No. You could say We were roommates, meaning you and him. But if you say We were roommates with him it unambiguously means "I and somebody else were roommates with him".
The original sentence may not make logical sense, but it is a perfectly normal way of saying it.
To complement the other answers, if using the first person past simple, I was, the most correct (formal) phrase would be:
Ross is a great guy. I was his roommate at college