0

I read the following sentence in a book:

In war, leaving a single enemy alive to tell the story allows fear to spread.

Why is there a comma after in war? As I understand it, there is a participial turn, but since it comes after, we should not put a comma. Or am I wrong and this is not a participial turn?

1
  • In that sentence, "leaving" is a gerund, not a participle. – Ben Kovitz Mar 27 at 2:35
2

Prepositional phrases that start a sentence are generally ended with a comma. This helps prevent confusion in introducing the subject.

If it were

In war leaving a single enemy alive ...

Would misdirect readers to initially think that "war" is leaving. When you say

In war, leaving a single enemy alive ...

It is clear that the prepositional phrase indicates a situation that applies to the statement, but is not participating as part of the subject.

1
  • thanks you for help – Omegon Mar 28 at 8:24
1

It’s not due to the participial phrase after the comma; it’s due to the introductory (in this case, prepositional) phrase before the comma.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.