I looked up an idiom in Merriam-webster.

But I couldn't understand why the sentence ends without anything after a preposition "in".

Doesn't it need "something" after "in"?

enter image description here

  • 4
    To dumb down X: to lower the general level of intelligence in X. Jun 8, 2021 at 18:44
  • 1
    Look at the first example as well: to lower... content of (something, such as a textbook). That also ends with a preposition "of", followed by a parenthetical object, "something". They expect the reader to take that as an example for "to lower the ...level... in". Jun 8, 2021 at 23:23

1 Answer 1


To dumb down [something] means to lower the level of intelligence in [that thing].
The existence of the direct object, and its usage after "in", is implied by the dictionary definition.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .