I looked up an idiom in Merriam-webster.
But I couldn't understand why the sentence ends without anything after a preposition "in".
Doesn't it need "something" after "in"?
English Language Learners Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for speakers of other languages learning English. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this communityI looked up an idiom in Merriam-webster.
But I couldn't understand why the sentence ends without anything after a preposition "in".
Doesn't it need "something" after "in"?
To dumb down [something] means to lower the level of intelligence in [that thing].
The existence of the direct object, and its usage after "in", is implied by the dictionary definition.