3

Which sentence is correct? If neither is correct, what should be the correct sentence?

  • These sites no longer use the "###check-also-box" widget.
  • These sites not use anymore the "###check-also-box" widget.
5
  • 1
    As @Aidan answers, the first is better. If the reader is a user and not a programmer I would delete the word "widget". – Ethan Bolker Jun 24 at 22:54
  • 1
    Not an answer by itself, but when in doubt, prefer the shortest grammatically correct form that unambiguously conveys your intended meaning. In English (and a significant majority of other languages for that matter), that will almost always be the idiomatic form, with the only major exceptions being idiomatic fixed phrases. – Austin Hemmelgarn Jun 25 at 11:46
  • 11
    "These sites not use anymore" isn't even English. – alephzero Jun 25 at 14:47
  • x no longer use y OR x do not use y any longer. – Lambie Jun 25 at 22:04
  • Why is this closed as off-topic? Word choice is very much on-topic. ell.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic – Aidan Jun 27 at 11:44
20

The first sentence is good.

If you want to use 'any more' then it is more natural (at least to me!) at the end: 'These sites do not use the "###check-also-box" widget any more.' But I prefer the first sentence.

2
  • You can also say "don't" instead of "do not", if you want. – user253751 Jun 25 at 23:52
  • @user253751 You can do, but this is technical writing. In such a context it would come across as a bit unprofessional and dancing-paperclippy. – Prime Mover Jun 26 at 13:05
13

The first is correct and good.

The second is grammatically incorrect.

  1. "anymore" should be "any more".

  2. "any more" should go at the end.

  3. There is a missing word "do".

Hence we have:

  • "These sites do not use the "###check-also-box" widget any more."

However, the first sentence is (in my opinion) better than the second, because it is shorter. In technical writing, it is often better to be brief, as long as you do not compromise accuracy and completeness.

EDIT: Whether to use "anymore" or "any more" is apparently stylistic. My preference is for "any more" but it may be the case that "anymore" is not incorrect.

15
  • 4
    Re 1: From Definition of Anymore by Merriam-Webster: "Although both anymore and any more are found in written use, in current writing anymore is the more common styling." I guess this is a regional issue. – L. F. Jun 25 at 11:29
  • 1
    @L.F. The Oxford online UK English dictionary (Lexico) gives "any more (North American anymore)" and does not list "anymore" as a word. The Oxford online US English dictionary gives "anymore (also any more)" but does not have an entry for "any more" or list the phrase under "any" or "more". – alephzero Jun 25 at 14:54
  • 4
    @PrimeMover In many ways US English is more old-fashioned than British English (e.g. verb forms like "gotten" died out centuries ago in British English). – alephzero Jun 25 at 14:58
  • 3
    @PrimeMover I don't know about the vocabulary/grammar, but the American accent is closer to the shared accent from colonial times; the modern British accent came later (perhaps as a way to distinguish themselves). Period/time-travel movies and TV shows generally get this backwards. – Barmar Jun 25 at 15:21
  • 1
    @Barmar I steer clear of such appalling abhominations as a matter of course, so it is highly unlikely I'll experience it. – Prime Mover Jun 25 at 16:36
1

"not use" is incorrect because "not" does not go before a verb. "use not" would be more grammatically correct, but would still not be standard English, because in standard English, only auxiliary verbs can be directly negated (in nonstandard or archaic English, you may see non-auxiliary verbs being directly negated). Since "use" is not an auxiliary verb, the dummy auxiliary verb "do" is added, giving "do not use".

0

As in other answers, the first sentence is standard/correct (apart from issues about "anymore" versus "any more").

People have asserted that the second sentence is "ungrammatical", and I agree that it "sounds wrong" (to a native U.S. English speaker...).

But to understand why it is "wrong" (from the perspective of a person whose first language is other than English... and I myself am acquainted a bit with French and Germa, also having studied Latin in school...), it is odd that the negation of "These sites use X." is not "These sites not use X." (or some other word order. Instead, the emphatic "do" is somehow required for the negation! It is ok for the positive assertion "These sites do use X.", though it does add emphasis. But, again, the negation without the emphatic "do" is incorrect?!? :)

3
  • en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Do-support - for some reason, in English, "not" can only follow auxiliary verbs and "to be" (is/are/am/...) - otherwise, you must add "do" (which is an auxiliary verb). Every English speaker must know this but it is certainly strange when compared to other languages. Even when the word "do" is used as a main verb, it cannot be negated directly, but requires an auxiliary "do" - e.g. "do not do this" – user253751 Jun 25 at 23:58
  • Exception that tests the rule: Yoda in The Empire Strikes Back breaks this rule and uses many other strange but technically-grammatical constructions, to show that he’s exotic, and to force the audience to think about what he says. – Davislor Jun 26 at 15:29
  • Word order is also much freer in English poetry, especially early-modern poetry. – Davislor Jun 26 at 15:32
0

The first sentence, as others have said, is fine.

For the second sentence, I don't think anyone emphasized sufficiently that you must put the word "do" before "not". That is required to make it grammatical. It is also rare to have "anymore" before the verb. So this is perfectly fine:

These sites do not use the ###check-also-box widget any more.

Now a couple of comments about formality. This sentence has a slightly more informal sound. It's still OK for formal writing - it's a mistake to think that "formal writing" and "informal writing" are totally different things. But this sentence is the way you would very often say it out loud, only then you would use a contraction. And also, the newer, now more common spelling "anymore" would probably be better, so you have:

These sites don't use the ###check-also-box widget anymore.

Be aware that extremely high avoidance of informality is not always the best even for technical writing. Your first sentence with "no longer use" is not excessively formal, and this last sentence with "don't use" is not too terribly informal. So both can work in lots of written contexts - your choice.