I'm aware that both it's not and it isn't are contractions of the same phrase, it is not.

Till today, I was convinced that choosing them depends on desired emphasis. This way, choosing it's not allows one to make an emphatic stress on not:

It's NOT my fault!

...and other than that it's just a matter of style, not grammar.

Recently, I was watching Monty Python's "Argument Clinic":

M: An argument isn't just contradiction.
A: It can be.
M: No it can't. An argument is a connected series of statements intended to establish a proposition.
A: No it isn't.
M: Yes it is! It's not just contradiction.
A: Look, if I argue with you, I must take up a contrary position.
M: Yes, but that's not just saying 'No it isn't.'
A: Yes it is!
M: No it isn't!

I was surprised they have never used it's not during the whole sketch.
This confused me a lot as it opposed my prior understanding: two people contradicting each other would rather use it's not.
More than that, at 01:42 they have used you did NOT and then you DIDN'T, which must indicate that the latter is more pathetic than the former.

So, how to choose a proper contraction between "it's not" versus "it isn't"? Which one is more emphatic, and how come a contracted variant looks more pathetic than the expanded one?


2 Answers 2


‘An A-Z of English Grammar and Usage’ by Leech and others suggests the following:

With be, use the contraction + not (e.g. That’s not right).

With have and modal auxiliaries, use the verb + n’t option, e.g. hasn’t, can’t.

The authors go on to say that forms such as She isn’t hungry, as opposed to She’s not hungry, are less common, and that forms such as I’ve not met him, as opposed to I haven’t met him, are much less common.

The authors don’t say on what basis they make their recommendations, but they are likely to be based on frequency of use. There doesn’t seem to be any difference of meaning or emphasis. I would just add myself that a contraction such as I’ve not met him sounds more formal, perhaps because of its lower frequency.

  • +1, looks like a rule. But.. doesn't it directly contradict the sketch? Commented Feb 21, 2013 at 9:01
  • 2
    Both kinds of contraction are found, so I don't think the recommendations are firm enough to be a rule. Commented Feb 21, 2013 at 9:03
  • 3
    @bytebuster: No, it doesn't... :^)
    – J.R.
    Commented Feb 21, 2013 at 10:07
  • 2
    @J.R. Is this the right room for an argument? :) Commented Feb 21, 2013 at 10:09

As you've said, placing emphasis on a word is a matter of desired emphasis which is a matter of personal style rather than rules. I think you could make exactly the same point by putting stress on isn't (It ISN'T my fault!)

In the Python sketch, the emphasised word is 'it' not, 'not'. Part of the humour in the sketch is the repetition of it - 'It is.' 'No, it isn't.' 'Yes it is.'. This wouldn't have carried the same impact if the humour was based on, perhaps, the back and forth of 'It's not', 'Yes, it is.' 'No, it's not.'

Also, they can do this with a number of forms of the sentences in the sketch, for example 'It can be.' 'No, it can't ...' The humour wouldn't carry through these sentences if the emphasis had been used on the 'Is/Not' structure.

  • Hmm, there's emphasis on is, not on it. I agree, however, that it is and it isn't rhymes better. Commented Feb 21, 2013 at 9:05
  • 1
    I agree there would have been no loss of meaning or grammatical correctness had the script been written with "No, it's not..." but I think the use of "No, it isn't..." gives the sketch an aura of sophistication you'd expect to hear; otherwise, it would have sounded more like 3rd-graders on a playground than intellectuals engaged in a paid argument. Many of Python's skits hinge on the utterly ridiculous being uttered urbanely, often rapid-fire. Brie, Roquefort, Pont-l'Eveque, Port Salut, Savoyard .. Bresse Bleu, Perle de Champagne?
    – J.R.
    Commented Feb 21, 2013 at 10:21

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .