The question in the title is corroborated by the explanations from Hewing's.
[1] We usually use the past simple rather than the past continuous to talk about repeated past actions:
- We went to Spain three times last year. (Taken from unit 4)
[2] We use the present perfect to talk about a past action, event or state, when there is some kind of connection with the present that a repeated event in the past may (or may not) happen again.
- Lee has represented his country on many occasions, and hopes to go on to compete in the next Olympics. (Taken from Grammar reminder).
Both [1] and [2] explain the two tenses can be used to talk about repeated actions in the past, although, in my view, the present perfect is more specific.
My question is, do these sentences below have exactly the same meaning with the examples from [1] and [2]? And generally, is it interchangable to use either past simple or present perfect to talk about repeated actions in the past? (Note that, the book doesn't tell whether they're interchangeable, it's my assumption that I want to confirm here.)
- We have gone to Spain three times last year.
- Lee represented his country on many occasions, and hopes to go on to compete in the next Olympics.
- Lee represented his country on five occasions. (Also, I want to know if this is correct.)