-1

Short version of my question:

How can I tell whether "you" in the following sentences is a personal pronoun or a personal determinative?

"You Hebrews have been nothing but trouble."

"You, the students, should form a society."

Longer (more detailed) version:

I was asking a question the other day on this website on the point of how to use commas with appositives, that is, in such cases like:

My brother Nathan is here.

(I have many brothers and the one I am talking about is Nathan, so this appositive must not be set off by commas).

and:

My brother, Nathan, is here.

(I have only one brother and his name is Nathan, so this appositive must be set off by commas).

My main focus was on how to go about such cases when one of the identifiers is the pronoun "you", for example:

You Hebrews have been nothing but trouble.

One supporter noted to me in his answer that "you" in that case was not a pronoun, but rather a personal determinative:

In this example, "you" is not a pronoun but a personal determinative, and "Hebrews" is not an appositive NP but head of the NP "you Hebrews", functioning as subject of the sentence.

When I asked him how he differentiated between a personal pronoun and a personal determinative, he provided the following explanation:

The personal determinatives are exactly parallel to the other definite determiners such as the demonstratives and the definite article in, for example, permitting quantifier "all" as a predeterminer, cf. "all we supporters of Brexit will win the argument". This property distinguishes them from the personal pronouns, which permit "all" only when postmodified, i.e. "All we/you who support Brexit will win the argument", but not *"All we/you will win the argument". Thus "we" and "you" are pronouns in "We, the supporters of Brexit, will win the argument"/ "You, the students, should form a society".

To this I told him that there was no word "all" in my sentence, so that method wouldn't help much. And I also said that I didn't see much structural difference between:

You Hebrews have been nothing but trouble.

and

You, the students, should form a society.

Unfortunately, somebody downvoted his answer and he took it as mine, so he stopped answering.

But I still want to know how to differentiate between the personal pronoun "you" and the personal determinative "you", especially in those two sentences above.

Can anybody, please, share their input on this?

6
  • The only reason I can see for using the comma is to make it clear who the speaker means by you (all the students, not just the individual being addressed). Commented Nov 2, 2021 at 9:09
  • @KateBunting - Thank you. But do you mean to say that without commas it would have been unclear that not just an individual was being addressed?
    – brilliant
    Commented Nov 2, 2021 at 9:38
  • It's impossible to say without context; I was only suggesting that as a possible reason. "You students should..." would be equally idiomatic. Commented Nov 2, 2021 at 10:02
  • @KateBunting - I see. But doesn't plural "students" make it clear that not only one individual is implied?
    – brilliant
    Commented Nov 2, 2021 at 11:14
  • Yes, of course - that's the reason for inserting 'the students' in to the sentence 'You should [do that]'. Commented Nov 2, 2021 at 16:34

1 Answer 1

1

To this I told him that there was no word "all" in my sentence, so that method wouldn't help much.

The point is that you can modify your sentence by putting "all" in and seeing whether it remains grammatical.

A personal determinative functions, as its name implies, as a determiner, which means that an additional determiner is ungrammatical. For instance, "You the Hebrews" is incorrect if "you" is being used as a personal determinative, because "the" is a determiner. "You, the students", on other hand, is correct because "you" is not being used as a personal determiner.

If "you" is being used as a pronoun, then it is the main label being applied to the audience, and any further label is being used appositively. If "you" is being used as a personal determinative, then the other label is the main label being applied to the audience, and "you" is used in a supplementary manner to emphasize that they are the audience.

2
  • Thank you for this explanation, but I am a bit confused by this phrase of yours: "A personal determinative functions, as its name implies, as a determiner, which means that an additional determiner is ungrammatical." What about such sentence like "He used up all the money I gave him." It has two consecutive determiners - "all" and "the" - but it sounds rather grammatical to me. Everything would be clear to me if "all" were not a determiner, but I just studied wiki page on determiners ( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Determiner ) and the word "all" is numbered among them there.
    – brilliant
    Commented Nov 3, 2021 at 7:31
  • Can you also, please, provide some sources that state that having an additional determiner is ungrammatical?
    – brilliant
    Commented Nov 3, 2021 at 23:14

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .