if the sentence you are analysing contains a modal verb, then it is positioned in ‘I’,any other verbs then being located in VP.
(English Syntax and Argumentation - Bas Aarts)

At first, I think the The bold clause should be "...is located..." but then I realize it might be in the form of a non-finite clause (ing clause with a subject) but I'm not sure. If it isn't, how you describe this usage? Is this common in English?


The clause you ask about is indeed a non-finite clause headed by a present participle (being located).

A clause of this sort is called an absolute clause. Unlike an ordinary participle clause, whose subject is inferred to be a constituent of the main clause and which thus is taken to modify that constituent, an absolute clause has its own subject. It has consequently only a very loose connection to the main clause: it is essentially an independent clause which is formally subordinated (by its non-finite verb) to its main clause so that it is cast as a ‘supplement’ to that main clause.

This answer and this one have more to say about absolute clauses.

  • Thank you Mr StoneyB. Does the word "then" function as a conjunctive adverb ? Can I insert more adverbs in such clauses. – user2747502 Aug 10 '14 at 19:52
  • @user2747502 1) No, it's an ordinary adverb meaning "next, thereafter". 2) Fersher. "... any other verbs thereupon/subsequently/in due course/in the fullness of time being located in VP. – StoneyB on hiatus Aug 10 '14 at 23:18
  • "next, thereafter": I think it's a bit more like in that case, the same kind of then that we find in if...then... - But that's just my opinion :) Nice answer +1 – Araucaria - Not here any more. Aug 11 '14 at 1:59

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.