3

1: He is no longer the person who he was ten years ago.

2: He is no longer the person that he was ten years ago.

Does the first sentence sound natural? Can "who" serve as a complement in a relative clause?

Thank you very much.

1

Both options listed by the original poster sound natural to my (American) ear. The "that" option sounds more natural to me than the "who" option. A third option would sound just as natural to me:

He is no longer the person he was ten years ago.

I would avoid the "who" option, because I try to avoid making choices between "who" and "whom". Choosing between "who" and "whom" interrupts my thoughts, both when speaking (or writing) a sentence, and when reading a sentence.

In other words, the choice between "who" and "whom" is consciously learned, not natural (in American English).

  • 1
    Leaving the "who" out sounds far more natural to me: ` He's no longer the person he was.` – Tᴚoɯɐuo Sep 14 '14 at 3:02
0

Yes, it can serve complement in a relative clause. And thus, both sentences are okay.

A sentence from the American Heritage Dictionary as mentioned in GrammarGirl

It is entirely acceptable to write either the man that wanted to talk to you, OR the man who wanted to talk to you.

The word that as a relative pronoun to mention a person has been quite common among authors.

However, I will go with GrammarGirl in this opinion of hers. It's interesting.

To me, using that when you are talking about a person makes them seem less than human. I always think of my friend who would only refer to his new stepmother as the woman that married my father. He was clearly trying to indicate his animosity and you wouldn't want to do that accidentally.

  • All your examples sound fine, however the example with 'who' in the original question sounds unnatural. – Alan Third Aug 13 '14 at 19:10
  • @ Alan Third Do you mean "He is no longer the person who he was ten years ago" sound unnatural? – April Aug 14 '14 at 10:58
  • @April you need to put @ symbol to notify Alan. – Maulik V Aug 14 '14 at 11:00
  • @april yes. I think it's probably OK English, but mostly you would hear that rather than who. – Alan Third Aug 18 '14 at 14:30

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.