0

I know if I say "If it were to rain, it would be a pleasant day". = If it rained, it would be a pleasant day".

But my query is if I say, "If he were to be selected, I would be very happy".

Does it is equivalent to "If he had to be selected, I would be very happy" or "If someone selected him", I would be very happy".

2 Answers 2

1

Yes, "If he were to be selected, I would be very happy" is good grammar, and yes, it means the same as, "If someone selected him", I would be very happy".

It does not mean the same as, "If he had to be selected, I would be very happy". There is no meaning of requirement in the original sentence, so "have to" has the wrong meaning.

1

This is the "second conditional", the condition "he were to be selected" refers to a hypothetical future state that is seen as unlikely. So it means roughly "If someone selects him (though I don't think anyone will select him)..."

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .