0

This context comes from the book "Black Rednecks And White Liberals" by Thomas Sowell

"Early Lebanese businesses in the United States were noted for “opening 16 to 18 hours daily,” utilizing “the assistance of the whole family."During the earlier rise of Chinese shopkeepers in Southeast Asia, sixteen-to-eighteen hour days were also common""

The word "opening" is confusing to me as I know that "open" means:

c. To begin business or operation: The store opens early on Saturday.(source thefreedictionary)

...so if the Lebanese businesses were noted for "opening" for me this means they were noted only for the hour they began their operation and not for when they were closing, but the sentence states both. Why? Is it just sloppy English?

17
  • 1
    Why do you have a problem with the continuous participle here? It's no different to Early Lebanese businesses in the United States were noted for having long opening hours, or ...were noted for being open from very early in the morning until very late at night. The reference is to the state of being open, not the actual "event" of opening the shop. Aug 1 at 15:58
  • Well I written it in the post =P I don't know how to clarify it. The word "open" as far as I know, means "to begin" but the writer uses it as meaning "begin and end" Aug 1 at 16:01
  • 1
    The word "open" has a range of meanings - including as a noun, the state of being open as well the verb sense to begin. In your context, opening is simply alternative phrasing for being open. Aug 1 at 16:04
  • But it's not a noun in this case, right? What is it then? You said it's a "continuous participle" participle is defined as "a word derived from a verb and used as an adjective, as in a laughing face" Is this an adjective then? Also I can find no definition of a noun "open" meaning "the state of being open" are you sure you didn't mean "open" as adjective("6. ready for business: the shops are open.") Aug 1 at 16:09
  • Maybe format grammatical terminology has some different way of describing the usage, but I don't know how that would help you understand what's going on here. All I'm saying is that in your specific context, opening is semantically and syntactically precisely equivalent to being open (the two forms are interchangeable, and mean exactly the same thing). Aug 1 at 16:11

0

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .