2

a. She didn't know that one of my friends was a policeman.

b. She didn't know that two of my friends were policemen.

Is it possible that I had other friends who were policemen but she knew about them?

In that case the sentences would sort of be ambiguous.

In one case, I had only one friend/two friends who were policemen.

In the other case, I had more but they just didn't know about one or two of them.

The reason I have two example sentences is that I think when we have 'one of my friends', we can replace it with 'a certain friend of mine' (that would make the friend more specific). With other numbers that option does not exist (maybe one could go for 'two specific friends of mine' but I think that would probably sound odd and won't help matters.

The idea is that I have a few friends who are policemen, but she doesn't know about one/two of th

1 Answer 1

3

Is it possible that I had other friends who were policemen but she knew about them?

It's possible, yes - but it's unlikely.

The sentence:

She didn't know that one of my friends was a policeman.

is likely not to be taken absolutely literally.

If it were taken literally, then, yes, you might have three friends, a teacher and two policemen and your sister might know that one of your friends is a teacher, another of your friends is a policeman and that you have a third friend - but she doesn't know that that friend (ie. "one of your friends") is also a policeman.

Instead

She didn't know that one of my friends was a policeman.

likely implies that, in fact:

She didn't know that any of my friends were policemen.


If, instead, you would like to indicate that she already knows that one of your friends (but not the other) is a policeman, you might write:

She didn't know that more than one of my friends were policemen.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .