"What it does is {VERB / to VERB / VERBing} ..."?

Question

For these expressions

What a paper shredder does is tearing the paper/tear the paper in small pieces which can be easily disposed.

What he wants to do is to become/become a ballplayer.

Which of these two forms is correct here to become/become, tearing/tear?

Answer 1

There are several different ways of producing subordinate clauses:

• with that ... that he becomes/should become a baseball player
• with a marked infinitive ... [him] to become a baseball player
• with an unmarked infinitive ... become a baseball player
• with for + a marked infinitive ... for him to become a baseball player
• with a gerund ... becoming a baseball player

Each lexical verb 'licenses' (permits) some of these, but not all. Want, for instance permits:

• He wants to become a baseball player ... with an implicit subject = the subject of the main clause
• I want him to become a baseball player ... AND
• I want for him to become a baseball player ... with a different subject

But you may not say

• ^✲I want that he should become a baseball player.
• ^✲He wants become a baseball player.
• ^✲He wants becoming a baseball player ... and so forth.

And when you move the pieces around to create what grammarians call cleft constructions, like your What sentences, you have to follow the requirements of the verb, as in What he wants ... is to become.

Do is a little tricky, because it's not ordinarily a main verb; but with other verbs it acts like a modal, taking an unmarked infinitive: Yes, the paper shredder does cut the paper into small pieces. That's why, in your example, you may use either to become to agree with wants or unmarked become to agree with do. In the other construction, though, there is no such ambivalence, and you want the unmarked infinitive:

• What the paper shredder does is tear the paper into small pieces.

---

^✲ marks an utterance as unacceptable

Answer 2

For the "become" example, both versions are correct in the sense that native speakers will sometimes say it that way. However, the "to" is not really needed, so the sentence is better without it. ("Omit needless words", as they say; and the version with the extra "to" is somewhat informal.)

What he wants to do is [to] become a ballplayer.

For the paper shredder example, "tearing" is incorrect. Same as with the other example, you can say "to tear", but plain "tear" is probably better. And I would use "into small pieces", not "in small pieces". (Also, every paper shredder I've ever met has had blades, so the correct verb would be cut, not tear, but now I'm just quibbling.)

What the paper shredder does is [to] tear the paper into small pieces.

Answer 3

In your second example, you should use become (without to), as in the following sentence:

the last thing I want my kids to do is become professional fighters.

In your first example, tear is what you should do. Similar phrases are the following ones:

What the church does is provide the mechanism for identifying exceptional holiness.

95% of what the government does is redistribute wealth.

If you change that or alter it by dieting, what the body does is resist.