3

In particular, the rights provided for under Arts 8, 9, 10 and 11 are subject to legal restrictions such as ♦ are:

. . . necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security or public safety

  1. Shouldn't there be pronouns at ♦ (my own addition), like "those that"? If not, how and why not?

  2. Are there any grammatical terms that describe the issues here?

Source: p 47, The English Legal System 2012-2013, Gary Slapper

1

The insertion you suggest could be helpful but here it is implied. I think it is the style adopted by Gary Slapper, perhaps related to the ways lawyers write and/or speak. In any case, it is not misleading and it is shorter, so to be commended!

  • I think that you're correct that this construction is specific to legal writing. Pronouns could be ambiguous, so I think legalese avoids them. – ColleenV parted ways Nov 26 '14 at 13:46

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.