Academics in the humanities played an active part by conceiving a real mythology of Sweden’s grand prehistoric past. According to the multi-talented Uppsala professor Olaus Rudbeck, Scandinavia, with Sweden at its centre, had actually been Atlantis, Plato’s ideal society, which made Sweden the origin of the whole of European civilisation. Rudbeck generously apportioned this honour equally to the western and eastern halves of the kingdom. Likewise, Daniel Juslenius, at Åbo Akademi, repeated in his dissertation Aboa vetus et nova (Åbo Old and New) in 1700 a story fabricated in the sixteenth century that his town had been founded immediately after the Flood by Noah’s son Magog Of course, the question is how many people had the opportunity to acquaint themselves with these learned mythologies.
(bolds by me)
A history of Finland by Henrik Meinander
I have two questions:
What does it mean to conceive a real mythology of Sweden’s past? Does it mean that the academics fabricated a mythology based on Sweden's actual history?
What is a learned mythology? According to Cambridge dictionary, one of the meanings of the word "learned" is: Learned behaviour has been copied from others. Does this refer to the meaning in the first question? That the mythologies are fictive?