What is the difference between 'sympathy for' and 'sympathy at' in the following sentences:

  1. I felt a great deal of sympathy for his difficult position.

  2. She expressed her sympathy at our loss.

Can we write 'for' in place of 'to' and vice versa? Are 'for' and 'to' the only prepositions which can collocate with the word 'sympathy'?

1 Answer 1


"Sympathy at" is not an idiom I am aware of. That collocation is much less common than "sympathy for" ('at' has ~400k Google hits vs. 15 million for 'for')-- I would say it is most likely a coincidence. Specifically, in

She expressed her sympathy at our loss

to me the most natural parse of this sentence would treat it as being of the pattern:

express [emotion] at [observed cause]

such as "He expressed frustration at her inability to keep up," or "She expressed concern at his disheveled appearance". So that the base usage is "to express sympathy" and then "at" is just introducing the situation causing her expression of (generic) sympathy, rather than further describing the type of sympathy being expressed (as in "sympathy for _").

To answer your second question, about other valid collocations. "Sympathy with" is pretty common (5.7 mil Google hits), with a slightly different meaning. As in the example here (def. 2.3) it's usually used as "in sympathy with _". C.f. solidarity.

There are other coincidental collocations--"You'll get no more sympathy from me" for instance--but these aren't really idiomatic or common.

  • Thanks for answering.So, is the word 'express' always followed by the preposition 'at', as far as emotions are concerned?
    – asterisk
    Aug 29, 2014 at 19:36
  • No, definitely not always. For example, "He expressed frustration about her inability to keep up" is valid. Aug 29, 2014 at 20:21
  • @asterisk You can rarely say always when it comes to prepositions. Aug 29, 2014 at 20:21

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .