I wonder if both of these sentences, "There is no frog" and "There are no frogs", grammatical in North American English.

From what I know, "no" can mean "not a/an" and "not any" based on the book, Oxford "how English works" (by Michael Swan & Catherine Walter). Can anyone confirm this?

  • 2
    Your frog sentences are fine. Your title needs an 'S' on nouns- There are no plural nouns. – Jim Sep 3 '14 at 2:23
  • 2
    I wrote them in all caps to denote blank fillers. – QPnoclue Sep 3 '14 at 4:58
  • No, you don't need an 's' on PLURAL NOUN because you're only referring to one plural noun!!!! :) – Araucaria - Not here any more. Sep 5 '14 at 0:44

There is no frog with feathers anywhere on earth. Are you quite sure you saw it flying?

There are no frogs in Antarctica.

"No frog" can be more strident than "no frogs". It would depend on the context.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.