It is the year twenty-twenty, and the world has changed.
This is a phrase that is odd in a way that I didn't realise until recently. Normally, calendar units are meant to be ordinal. 'The twenty-fifth of December', 'the twenty-fifth of the twelfth'. Similarly, 'the second decade of the nineteenth century'. Or even 'second day of the week'. Clearly, a timestamp is a cardinal value.
And yet for some reason 'January two thousand and ten' is a thing instead of 'January two thousand and tenth'. And it seems to be a persistently widespread phenomenon. At first I thought it was a case of vernacular ending-dropping in general, but it seems to be (a) happening with years much more often than with any other context and (b) seems to happen even in formal language and official documents where vernacular forms are avoided. Also, I am aware (but did not immediately consider) that ordinal numbers sometimes use another word instead of an ending ('number 17', '#21', '№007' and the like), but that isn't in use with the year of a date either.
So why are years conveyed as cardinal even though one would normally expect them to be an ordinal value due to being a part of a timestamp?