0

The bar in Barcelona which I met my wife in is still there.

What does 'in' in the relative clause of this sentence mean? To understand this what subjects should I study?

1
  • 3
    The speaker met his wife in a bar. The bar was in Barcelona. The sentence is clumsily expressed; it would be more natural to say The bar in Barcelona where I met my wife... Jan 23, 2023 at 10:44

2 Answers 2

2

This subject in grammar is called deferred prepositions. There is below the essential of what is useful to know about it, as shown in § 9.6 of CoGEL.

(CoGEL § 9.6) Normally a preposition must be followed by its complement, but there are some circumstances in which this does not happen. In the following three cases the DEFERMENT of the preposition is obligatory.

(a) Passive constructions with a prepositional verb where the subject corresponds to the prepositional complement in the active […]:
• Has the room been paid for?
• ∼ Has X paid for the room?
• ≁ *Has for the room been paid?
• She was sought after by all the leading impresarios of the day. [also in premodification : 'a much sought-after singer']
• He was not paid attention to.

(b) Infinitive clauses with thematization of the prepositional complement […]:
• He's impossible to work with.

(c) -ing clauses with thematization:
• He's worth listening to.

With interrogative and relative pronouns as prepositional complement, there are often alternative positions available: one formal with the preposition in its normal place before the complement [1, 2], the other informal with the preposition deferred to final position [1a, 2a]:

WH-QUESTIONS […]:
• At which house did you leave the car? < formal > [1]
• Which house did you leave the car at? [1a]

Usually […]:
• Where did you leave your car? [1b]

RELATIVE CLAUSES […]:
• The old house about which I was telling you is empty. < formal > [2] […]
• The old house (which) I was telling you about is empty. [2a]

A prejudice against such deferred (or 'stranded') prepositions [1a, 2a] remains in formal English which, for direct or indirect questions and for relative clauses, offers the alternative of an initial preposition [1, 2]. The alternative construction is often felt, however, to be stilted and awkward, especially in speech. In some cases, such as the following, the deferred preposition has no preposed alternative:

What did she look like?
What I'm convinced of is that the world's population will grow to an unforeseen extent.
All she could talk about was her dog.

In general, it is the most common and the short prepositions which can be deferred, in particular spatial prepositions […], compare:

• He left his coat in the car.
∼ . . . the car in which he left his coat
∼ . . . the car (that) he left his coat in

• He left politics because of the election results.
∼ . . . the election results because of which he left politics
∼ . . . * the election results (that) he left politics because of

• The plane was destroyed through the pilot's carelessness.
∼ . . . the pilot's carelessness through which the plane was destroyed
∼ . . . * the pilot's carelessness ((that) the plane was destroyed through

CoGEL     A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language
∼            systematic correspondence between structures
≁            no systematic correspondence between structures
*             unacceptable

1

You could say:

The bar in which I met my wife, is still open.

But when you mention the location, in this case Barcelona, it is more natural to use the relative pronoun where =

The bar where I met my wife is in Barcelona and it is still open.

The bar in Barcelona, where I met my wife, is still there.

However, as FF mentions in the comments, there is nothing wrong with the following:

The bar in Barcelona, in which I met my wife, is still open.

Maybe I have misunderstood the OP's question but I think it revolves around "in". The preposition in is used with/without names of streets, villages, towns, cities, countries and continents.

That bar is in Las Ramblas which is in Barcelona.
Barcelona is a city in Spain, a country in Europe.

4
  • I don't understand as soon as you mention its location. Are you suggesting we must change in which to where simply to avoid two instances of in in the same sentence? There's nothing wrong with The bar in Barcelona in which I met my wife... Jan 23, 2023 at 12:33
  • @FumbleFingers There is nothing wrong with "in which", but it is felt to be formal, and that deters speakers from using it.
    – LPH
    Jan 23, 2023 at 12:58
  • 1
    You can use commas and then the nonsense (that would be felt in a plain context) disappears. "The bar in which I met my wife , in Barcelona , is still open."
    – LPH
    Jan 23, 2023 at 13:09
  • @LPH oh yes, thanks.
    – Mari-Lou A
    Jan 23, 2023 at 15:40

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .