0

This is a sentence from a contact of sale of a property:

The purchaser has agreed to abandon the right of lane way attached to the property.

I simply thought there is a lane way right next to the property, and it is a physical fact and it is not part of the property.

Still, I looked up "attached" and there is a meaning "connected to" with an example: a house with an attached garage.

Then I thought "just like a garage is part of the property as a whole" may be the lane way in the above sentence could also be a part of the property, which is why the seller wants to block the buyer to use the lane way.

So, I want to ask, does the word "...attached to.." simply refer to a physical fact meaning "...next to/adjacent to.."? Or does it mean that the laneway is an attachment of the property?

5
  • 1
    If this is part of a contract, attached may have a specific legal meaning.
    – stangdon
    Feb 23, 2023 at 18:42
  • I think there's a transcription error. Google finds just 4 instances of the sequence "right of lane way". Feb 23, 2023 at 18:55
  • 1
    I’m voting to close this question because it's asking us to interpret a legal text - either mistranscribed or not written by a native Anglophone lawyer in the first place. ELLINAL! Feb 23, 2023 at 18:58
  • 1
    This is typical legal language in real estate. A right-of-way lane is correct, The right-of-way lane is attached i.e. is part of the property. Attachments can be man made or natural: study.com/academy/lesson/… And this legal English is fine. This question should not be closed.
    – Lambie
    Feb 23, 2023 at 20:25
  • I agree that it should be closed. It is not a question of learning English, but a question of specific legal interpretation. The OP should consult a legal expert on the proper interpretation of this easement. Or, if this just reading contracts for the purpose or studying English, then find a better source!
    – James K
    Feb 23, 2023 at 20:37

1 Answer 1

1

The word "attached" can be sued in several different senses. But in th given example:

The purchaser has agreed to abandon the right of lane way attached to the property.

what is attached seems to be a right, not the physical lane. So I take this text to mean that the right of use of the lane is, or has been associated with the property, that it, in a sense, comes with the ownership of the property. Of course it is no doubt also true that the physical lane is adjacent to the rest of the property.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .