In a recent ESL test, the question was whether the following sentence contained the passive voice: People should be concerned about how to find alternatives to fossil fuels.

The answer book says yes, and I see the logic to that when the definition of concern is to make some worried. However, can it also be argued that this sentence is active and concerned is an adjective?

  • 1
    I agree with you. Be concerned means that they should actively worry about it. Commented Apr 19, 2023 at 8:20

2 Answers 2


I would tend to agree.

Past participles in English can be promoted to adjectives. And this can result in sentences that can be parsed in several different ways.

To distinguish you can ask "could I modify this word with adverbs of degree, like very?" and "could I form comparative or superlative forms with more or most?" If you can, that would suggest the word is an adjective. On the other hand you could ask "can I add a by someone phrase", to provide the subject of a corresponding active clause, or "can I rephrase in the active voice". Either of those would suggest that the word is a verb.

To some degree both adjective and verb are possible

People should be very concerned

People should be concerned by something about...

Something should concern people about ...

Looking at these, the first is completely acceptable. The second is somewhat odd (the about part doesn't fit) and the third doesn't really work at all.

In conclusion "be concerned" is best understood as an adjective, and not a past participle forming the passive voice.


I am going to argue for the opposite point of view from James K: yes, this should be considered a use of the passive voice.

The passive voice is characterized by the verb to be and the past participle of a verb. We have to be, with the modal should, and concern is definitely a verb, with the same meaning that it has here, of which concerned is the past participle. So grammatically, it's definitely in the passive voice.

The issue is slightly complicated by the fact that about isn't in how we usually construct passive sentences. If we make "A bear ate him" passive, it's "He was eaten by a bear"; if we make "The news hurt her" passive, it's "She was hurt by the news." But I think we need to consider about as kind of idiomatic with concerned and it is certainly possible to say "concerned by".

Lastly, I think (and I think this is where James K and I mostly agree) the difference is kind of academic in a lot of cases, including this one. You can always think of a passive sentence as being like "They possess the state of concerned-about-X", and participles as a way of adjective-izing verbs.

  • 2
    The point James K makes is that in order to determine whether something is "the past participle of a verb", we have to look at how it functions, not how it's spelled.
    – hobbs
    Commented Apr 19, 2023 at 14:18
  • I'm leaving my answer in place, but I do agree with the last paragraph. In most cases of "is it an adjective or participle" questions one gets very little insight into meaning from the parsing. In many cases the parsing is simply ambiguous, yet there the meaning would be the same. One thing here is that verbal sense of concern "relate to" isn't invoked here, only the sense of "make someone worried"
    – James K
    Commented Apr 19, 2023 at 17:13

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .