For example, as the essay suggests,the convenience and efficiency of intelligent machines can actually free up human time and energy to focus on creative pursuits and higher-level thinking. This can lead to new discoveries and insights that would not have been without the collaboration between humans and machines.

I have two questions.

  1. Is the second sentence suggesting subjunctive mood?If so, I think "would have been" indicates possibility in the past. And it can be paraphrased into "If there had not been the collaboration between human and machines, new discoveries and insights would not have been." Why the writer didn't use the subjunctive mood that indicates possibility in the future?
  2. Can otherwise be used here?This can lead to new discoveries and insights that would be otherwise impossible.
  • 1
    [Why did the writer use etc. OR Why didn't the writer use x]
    – Lambie
    Commented May 28, 2023 at 15:02

1 Answer 1


First, note that "be" here is used as the main verb "to exist": discoveries and insights that would not have existed without the collaboration, etc. This should simplify your grammatical analysis.

As for the subjunctive, "would not have been" is the consequent of this conditional, and it would normally be the antecedent that would show a subjunctive mood. But the antecedent here is a noun phrase ("the collaboration").

If we change it to a verb (and also modify the sentence to allow a verb that shows subjunctive inflection), we'll see that in this irrealis context, a subjunctive is perfectly possible:

This discovery would not be possible if I weren't collaborating with machines.

(Note that many native speakers are losing the subjunctive in casual use and would say "wasn't" there — not because it's the wrong context, but because they don't use the subjunctive at all. In Canada, my work often involves hearing prayers, and people often say things like: "I pray that this is a good day." Should be "be".)

Your question about the tense is good. Yes, "would not be/exist" would accord better with the tense of "this can lead to". The writer does a mental shift from the beginning of the sentence in the abstract/present to a time in the future already looking back at something that has been created. And that is not ideal style, even if it's not egregious.

"Otherwise" works pretty well. I would place it either before "be" or after "impossible", probably preferring the latter.

that would be impossible otherwise.

However, there is a slight logical leap here. "Otherwise" means "if something were not the case". In your sentence, if you remove "the collaboration", you have to scan back through the paragraph to find what alternative is being negated by "otherwise". If you do so, you'll find that the most logical candidate is to negate the existence of intelligent machines, but their existence isn't explicitly predicated. What is predicated is that their convenience and efficiency can free up human time and energy. Thus, unless the read processes it thoroughly enough to realize this, "otherwise" strongly suggests that the discoveries and insights would not have been possible if convenience and efficiency didn't free up human time and energy — and that hypothetical seems hardly worth speculating about, being close to a contradiction in terms.

Hence, if you were to use "otherwise", I would try to keep some reference to is actually being contrasted: the collaboration or the machines' existence (or, if I read into the paragraph more than it really says, our hearty acceptance of intelligent machines, or what have you).

  • What is all this about subjunctive mood? I really don't understand that at all.
    – Lambie
    Commented May 28, 2023 at 15:42
  • @Lambie The idea in general, or my remarks on it in this case? Commented May 28, 2023 at 15:47
  • You talk about it as if it were a "thing". It really isn't called that anymore. And that example with pray is quite obscure. But we still say things like: May he have a long life! in certain circumstances. And I recommend he leave now. [no s].
    – Lambie
    Commented May 28, 2023 at 15:53
  • @Lambie Sadly, like the modern major-general, my knowledge of linguistics has only been brought down to the beginning of the century — when I learned it, it was still "tense-aspect-mood" :) I'd say that a hypothetical/unreal context licenses the subjunctive mood. "If it be your will that a haert be true," as Leonard Cohen sings. And I agree about your subjunctives — you and I say them, but I find fewer and fewer do... "I recommend that he goes!" they say. Commented May 28, 2023 at 19:47
  • Thank your for your really helpful answer.
    – 庄怀玉
    Commented May 29, 2023 at 7:08

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .