Does it sound right to say:

He is always eating like a pig, leaving crumbs all over the table.

(Using Present Continuous, because of always + negative connotation)

  • 4
    To my ear, "He always eats like a pig" sounds more natural. Might be an en-gb vs en-us thing. Commented Oct 6, 2014 at 10:41
  • @MattBrennan Also to my ear, but if we are talking academically correct - it's Present Cont. Commented Oct 6, 2014 at 10:50
  • 2
    I think they have slightly different meanings. "always eats" implies that when he eats, it is like a pig. "is always eating" implies that he is eating constantly (and the eating resembles that of a pig).
    – Holloway
    Commented Oct 6, 2014 at 12:19
  • 1
    As you said, "is always eating" implies that he is eating constantly, but in this context it sounds he becomes like a pig because he leaves crumbs all over the table not for eating constantly and a lot, so "He always eats like a pig" isn't better? (When he eats he is like a pig because he leaves crumbs all over the table).
    – user10854
    Commented Oct 6, 2014 at 13:25
  • 1
    Try: "He pigs out, leaving crumbs all over the table." For ELL, urban dictionary is an excellent resource.
    – Sun
    Commented Oct 6, 2014 at 16:24

6 Answers 6


Like Matt Brennan in the comments above, I'd also consider

a) "He always eats like a pig."

more natural than your

b) "He is always eating like a pig."

In fact, these two expressions have a subtle difference in meaning. Specifically, the word "always" generally means "every time" when applied to the simple present tense as in (a), but "all the time" when applied to the continuous tense in (b).

Thus, sentence (a) is simply a statement about the subject's consistently bad eating habits, whereas sentence (b) also implies that he spends a lot of his time eating, which may or may not be what you want to imply.

(In fact, you could even leave out the word "always" from sentence (a) entirely — a simple present sentence that does not, by itself or in context, refer to any specific time is generally understood to describe habitual behavior. Thus, simply saying "he eats like a pig" is perfectly sufficient to describe someone's typical eating habits.)

Also, as noted by hunter and queeg, the idiom "eat like a pig" carries connotations of both eating messily (which you seem to want) and eating a lot (which you apparently don't). There is a related idiom, "eat like a horse", which implies only the latter, but no common idiom that I'd know of that would only suggest messy eating habits without implying anything about the quantity eaten.

That said, you can certainly clarify the meaning with a subordinate clause, as you've done in your original sentence. Thus, the following sentence would work perfectly well:

a') "He (always) eats like a pig, scattering crumbs all over the table."

A minor remaining dissonance is that, at least to my ear, "eating like a pig" would usually imply a somewhat higher degree of messiness than merely leaving crumbs on the table — the mental image I get is of someone eating as much and as fast as they can, making a lot of noise and splattering food (not just crumbs) all over the place.

Using such a strong idiom, and then implying that the real issue is just a few crumbs on the table, makes the speaker sound very fussy — which, of course, could be exactly the effect you're going for. If not, though, you might want to go for something a bit less evocative, like, say, simply "he always eats messily, [...]."

  • And the opposite of "eat like a horse", which is "eat like a bird". Any clever opposites for "eat like a pig"? Commented Oct 6, 2014 at 13:16
  • 1
    It's not a well known idiom, but to "eat like a raccoon" is to eat in a fastidious/clean way (because raccoons sometimes wash their food before eating it).
    – Calphool
    Commented Oct 6, 2014 at 14:57
  • eat like an infant/toddler? They don't necessarily eat a lot but sure are messy.
    – Dzyann
    Commented Apr 17, 2015 at 18:25

The verb tense is executed exactly correctly (for just the reason that you say); however,

  • "Eat like a pig" might be understood to mean "eat a lot," as opposed to "eat in a sloppy fashion." (But it's not wrong to use it the way you did either.)
  • You mean "crumbs," not "crumbles."
  • Is there an idiom to express "to eat in a sloppy fashion"? Commented Oct 6, 2014 at 10:22
  • If you check definitions of "eat like a pig" on the internet, many of them define it as eating noisily and messily, many define it as eating excessively and many define it as both. So I don't think it's right to say that "typically" it has only one of those meanings. Commented Oct 6, 2014 at 12:44
  • I don't actually agree with hunter. I'm a native English speaker, been one for 40+ years, and when I hear "eat like a pig" I absolutely think "eat a lot" and "eat in a messy way". In fact, I'd typically clarify by asking a follow up question: "Do you mean he eats a lot, or that he's messy, or both?"
    – Calphool
    Commented Oct 6, 2014 at 15:02
  • I edited my answer to be a little softer, since it sounds like this isn't consensus.
    – hunter
    Commented Oct 6, 2014 at 15:44

There are at least four distinct possibilities here:

  • "He always eats like a pig" means that, when he eats, he always does it messily and/or to excess;

  • "He is always eating like a pig" means that he eats all the time and, furthermore, he eats messily and/or to excess;

  • "He is always eating, like a pig" means pigs eat all the time and so does he;

  • "He always eats, like a pig" means that pigs eat whenever they have the opportunity and so does he.


If you change 'crumbles' to 'crumbs' the sentence would be ok.

Crumbles is what happens, for example, to a dry biscuit that you break and crush. Crumbs are the mess left behind after eating said biscuit, usually down the front of your clothes.

If, whilst eating, I'm gulping big mouthfuls of food, barely chewing, gasping for breath, eating all that is in front of me, focussing on little else (imagine smudges of food over my face), then saying I'm 'eating like a pig' would be apt. Think of Mr Creosote from the Meaning of Life. Pigs eat anything and everything (pigfarms in Snatch).

But if I'm making a mess with crumbs (crumbsies on his jacketsies - Gollum to Sam), I'm unlikely to be called a pig. But I could be called mucky, careless, scruffy. Another animal 'idiom' would be a muckypup.

I'd be quite offended if someone called me a pig for getting digestives/elvin bread/wafer thin mint down my front. But I'd probably smile (if I heard) if I was compared to a pig whilst my face was buried into a mountain of food.


(I don't have high enough reputation to comment, otherwise this would be a comment.)

'He is always eating like a pig...' does flow a little oddly, but I'd use a contraction, i.e. 'He's always eating like a pig...' :-) 'He always eats like a pig' flows a little oddly to my ear, personally.

I'm a native Australian English speaker, though it's not my first.


Though not a native English, I was taught that always + continuous tense can express a strong dislike or aversion towards the act mentioned.

  • 1
    So a sentence like she's always helping people poses a real semantic challenge for you? :)
    – oerkelens
    Commented Oct 6, 2014 at 12:58
  • You're right, I should rephrase it to "can express" or "may express". On the other hand, even helping others can be disliked, based on the intentions or values of the person saying your sentence ;) Commented Oct 6, 2014 at 14:36
  • 1
    Actually, it totally depends on the stress of the word "always" when it's spoken. If someone says "She is AAAAAAALways doing that," then it's an expression of dislike. It's saying "She does something that I can't tolerate, and she's doing it AGAIN!" On the other hand, if someone simply says "She is always doing that." with no stress on the word "always" then it can simply mean it's something she does a lot, with no dislike implied at all. Since it can be confused though (especially in writing), a native speaker will typically say "She does that a lot." instead of "She is always doing that."
    – Calphool
    Commented Oct 6, 2014 at 15:09
  • @JoeRounceville thank you for elaborating it, it's very educational. Commented Oct 7, 2014 at 8:24

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .