1
  • You are my forever kind of love, a love for the soul that can never die.

what is the relative clause (that can never die) modifying? Love or Soul.
I think the relative clause is modifying 'Love', but there's an argument to be made for the relative clause modifying "soul" as well.

1
  • It means the love that can never die (regardless of what a soul might do). It emphasises what the first part of the sentence says: my forever kind of love. Commented Mar 16 at 19:44

1 Answer 1

2

It's ambiguous. It could be read both ways. But the text is not the kind of text that needs a single interpretation. It is not a legal contract. The ambiguity might be deliberate (with both meanings intended) or not.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .