0

Parks, woodlands, forests, jungles are areas where countless of living organisms had made their homes. And where they’d probably live for thousands of years. If we don’t send (over) our chainsaws first.”

Is the over necessary? (or maybe there's a better option?)

  • 1
    I'd use send in. And there's no subject in that last clause. – StoneyB on hiatus Oct 13 '14 at 2:38
  • @StoneyB Sorry. I forgot the we. – alexchenco Oct 13 '14 at 2:47
1

If you just say:

If we don’t send our chainsaws first.

it does not really say where the chainsaws would be sent to, though it may be implied in context.

But when you say:

If we don’t send over our chainsaws first.

the meaning is the same as:

If we don’t send our chainsaws over (there) first.

"there" being the "Parks, woodlands, forests, jungles" mentioned in the previous sentence.

Another example:

I received your payment. I will send your package tomorrow.

does not really say where you are sending it to, while:

I received your payment. I will send over your package tomorrow.

means the package will be sent to you.

  • How about using in as StoneyB suggested? – alexchenco Oct 13 '14 at 3:23
  • I wouldn't use "send in" in your example. An example that comes to mind using "send in" would be "send in the troops". But that is saying sending into somewhere, not from point A to point B, as in send over. – user3169 Oct 13 '14 at 4:18

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.