1

I just have looked of the following information. Does the following sentence wrong? "If you not got a job, what would you do? "If you did not Have a job, What would you do? <=Is this very old fasion sentence?

  • 1
    The older form of "did not have" is "had not", not "not got". – Dan Getz Oct 20 '14 at 1:33
  • 6
    Only people over the age of 250. – snailcar Oct 20 '14 at 1:40
  • 1
    You didn't mean "If you've not got …", did you? – Dan Getz Oct 20 '14 at 1:48
  • 1
    If you didn't have a job, what would you do? and If you had no job, what would you do? are equally correct, although the former is much more common than the latter (the auxiliary do). I suspect the choice between the two is regional not age-based, but I don't have any evidence for that, so I can't really answer. – Joe Oct 20 '14 at 2:04
  • 2
    @user1917217 ell.stackexchange.com/questions/26657/… – snailcar Oct 20 '14 at 2:11
2

No, you cannot omit the auxiliary do in a sentence like If you did not have a job, what would you do? The proposed sentence If you not got a job, what would you do? is incorrect.

You can, however, contract the words did and not into the contraction didn't, to form the sentence If you didn't have a job, what would you do?

Contractions like didn't are very common in spoken English and informal writing. In formal writing, they are more likely to be avoided (opinions vary on whether or not they are appropriate).

Using did not instead of didn't in casual speech would make it sound a little more formal and perhaps slightly old-fashioned, but not excessively so, in my opinion. I think the passage you quote is an exaggeration.

  • 2
    Or if you want to emphasize the not: "I did not take the last piece of cake." – user3169 Oct 20 '14 at 1:59
  • 2
    If you had no job, what would you do? is correct, and is roughly what the user is asking about (I assume the reference to didn't have a car is a reference to a question from a few days ago) – Joe Oct 20 '14 at 2:00
  • 1
    @Joe: True, but that construction works only in certain situations. In the sentence If you didn't have three children, what would you do?, I don't see an easy way to rephrase without the auxiliary. – Nate Eldredge Oct 20 '14 at 2:03
  • 1
    If you had fewer than three children... or If you had no children, depending on what you're trying to explain. In that case it's more likely to use that construct really - If you didn't have three children leaves it somewhat unclear whether you mean if you had some number other than three, or specifically none. – Joe Oct 20 '14 at 2:05
  • 1
    I suppose the difference is the auxiliary do lets you negate the whole participle, ie, If you didn't have a job -> If !(have a job), while If you had no job is If have !(job), which is (subtly) different. – Joe Oct 20 '14 at 2:07

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.