What is the difference in meaning between the following sentences?

  • I have nothing.

  • I don't have anything.

  • 5
    There is no difference in meaning. They are interchangeable. Obviously their syntax is different.
    – user6951
    Nov 2, 2014 at 13:15
  • 1
    While there is no difference in meaning, the latter can be used more emphatically. Oddly, according to Google nGram viewer, the former is far more used than the latter (not what I would have expected)
    – Timr
    Nov 2, 2014 at 16:33

3 Answers 3


There is a discussion of something similar between the novelists Ford Madox Ford and Joseph Conrad. Ford was trying to explain to Conrad the nuanced difference between "without a penny" and "penniless".

I have nothing could mean "Everything has been taken from me." (e.g. King Lear)

*I don't have anything" could mean "At the moment, I don't have an answer, I don't have any money on me, I have no contraband on my person, etc etc"

  • My first thought was about the context that they would be used in. "I don't have anything." is what you would say to a suspicious police officer. "I have nothing." is what you would say when you have lost everything dear to you. Technically they mean the same thing, but the emphasis is different. Nov 3, 2014 at 3:21

To me, the difference is in the subject/verb agreement. I have something. I don't have something. So, which to use depends on which direction the writer or speaker wants the verb to take the subject. Above, the something the speaker has is nothing and the something the speaker doesn't have is anything. A spiritual master could say, "Enlightenment has taught me no thing is Dharma. I have Dharma. Thus, I have nothing." If the master instead says, "I don't have anything", it would ruin the syllogism and the "no thing" "nothing" (sort of) homonym. On the other hand some insecure teen might complain to her friends, "Boys like you because... You've got big hair. You can dunk a basketball. You can sing. You're a science nerd. But me, I don't have anything." If instead she said, "I have nothing", it would work grammatically in the complaint, but it wouldn't be as large of a contrast to the listener/reader. All the friends "have a thing" and the speaker emphasizes she "doesn't have a thing". If that thought finishes with, "I have nothing", then her friends each "have a thing" and so does she, even though the "thing" she has is "nothing".

It's up to the writer (or the speaker themselves) to decide what the speaker wants to emphasize, positively possessive or negatively possessive, I have or I don't have.

(Am I going down a rabbit hole here?) Generally, any pair of "opposite words" will substitute for "nothing" and "anything" above, and the same "I have" versus "I don't have" pseudo-rule applies. "I have love". "I don't have hate". Those two sentences only equate if there is no middle ground between love and hate, if in the absence of hate there is only love, if in the absence of anything there is only nothing. (And you can get into juicy ontological discussions about the nature of reality like "if 'there is nothing', then nothing 'is' a thing and so in the absence of anything, nothing itself would also be absent. No thing survives the absence of anything. So, what do you call what's left when there is nothing left? [Right!]")


"I don't have anything' Is a straightforward negation of "I have something". It implies an absence.

"I have nothing" logically carries the same meaning, but it is actually stronger for most people. It begins with an affirmative "I have" and then proceeds to the absolute "nothing".

  • 1
    Isn't the straightforward negation of "I have something" actually "I don't have something"? Nov 3, 2014 at 13:20
  • 1
    @Araucaria. Technically yes. However, in the context we are discussing, "I don't have anything" conveys a meaning similar to "I have nothing" though, as I suggested in my answer above, the latter has a stronger idea of 'nothingness'. "I don't have something", because 'some' is used if the idea is restricted or limited in some way" [Leech (1986.34), *The English Verb] lacks the idea of unrestricted nothingness. So, in practical terms, "I don't have anything" is the negation of "I have something".
    – tunny
    Nov 3, 2014 at 13:55

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .