0

O'Sullivan & Hilliard's The Law of Contract (2018 8 ed). p. 115.

6.72. High Trees is in many ways a weak precedent. The case is so influential and well known that students often forget that it was a first instance decision, which was '(remarkably)' delivered unreserved, and that all the discussion about the binding nature of the promise to reduce the rent during the war years was strictly obiter (described by Arden LJ in Collier v P&MJ Wright (Holdings) Ltd (2007) as Denning J’s ‘brilliant obiter dictum’)

Ewan McKendrick. Contract Law: Text, Cases, and Materials (2018 8 ed). p 217.

Commentary

Professor Treitel has stated (Some Landmarks of Twentieth Century Contract Law (Oxford University Press, 2002), p. 29) that ‘the High Trees case is surely one of the most prominent of the landmarks in twentieth century contract law’. He notes that its exalted status is, in many

p 218.

ways, remarkable given that it was apparently argued and decided in one day. The judgment of Denning J was therefore, in all probability, an unreserved judgment. As Professor Treitel has remarked, ‘if there was any time for reflection, it could at most have been the luncheon recess’. The facts of the case are rather unusual in that the litigation was conducted between members of the same corporate group and it is not altogether clear why the claim was brought in the first place. The claim may not in fact have been a ‘friendly’ one but a keenly fought contest between the defendant and the creditors of the plaintiff company.

(remarkably) implies that the author of the above quote was startled. So which definition fits? I quote ODO's definitions of 'unreserved'.

  1. Without reservations; complete
  2. Frank and open
  3. Not set apart for a particular purpose or booked in advance
  • 1
    I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because this use of "unreserved" is very detailed legal jargon. A judge or law professor in the appropriate jurisdiction would know the answer; very few non-lawyers (even with access to a comprehensive dictionary) would be able to determine the answer. – Jasper Feb 12 '15 at 6:57
2

Unreserved here is legal jargon, meaning that the judge did not "reserve judgment": put the case on hold for a while while he researched legal precedent and determined how a complex issue should be resolved.

The judge's discussion was "obiter"—that is, it was stated "by the way" as a matter of his own opinion, not a part of the judgment itself, and hence not to be received as a precedent.

0

I think that looking closer at "without reservations" in the first definition might be helpful. You could also describe unreserved as "not cautious or reticent". When the decision was delivered, the bench didn't anticipate all of the implications of the decision, so the decision stated what ever it stated without much explanation or caveat. It was only the later obiter that addressed the finer points of the decision and made it a valuable precedent.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.