3

In the website, http://www.linguisticsgirl.com/the-object-complement-in-english-grammar/, it is said that a noun clause can function as an object complelemt. There are three examples:

  1. The judges will announce the winner whoever brought the red velvet cake.
  2. Most critics consider one theme of the story what you wrote about in your final paragraph.
  3. I declare the problem that you do not want to learn about grammar.

I think in sentence 1, the clause "whoever brought the red velvet cake" serves as object clause, in sentence 2, "what you wrote about in your final paragraph" object clause, and in sentence 3, "that you do not want to learn about grammar" appositive clause.

My explanation is as follows:
In sentence 1, the original word order is "The judges will announce whoever brought the red velvet cake the winner" in which "whoever brought the red velvet cake " serves as the direct object and "the winner" serves as the object complement. Since the object complement is a lot shorter than the direct object, so the word order is changed into "announce the winner whoever brought the red velvet cake" to keep its balance. So the clause "whoever brought the red velvet cake" serves as the object clause rather than object complement clause.

The rule that caused sentence 1 to change word order also applies to sentence 2.

Am I right? I think there is no object complement clause and the noun clause has only four subsets: object clause, subject clause, appositive clause and subject complement clause.

  • 1
    Did you try to find the answer to your question on Internet first? – user11470 Nov 23 '14 at 15:14
  • 1
    thefreedictionary.com/complement+clause // a subordinate clause that functions as the subject, direct object, or prepositional object of a verb, as that you like it in I'm surprised that you like it. Also called com′plement sen`tence. – user11470 Nov 23 '14 at 15:15
  • 1
    I'm not so sure about the grammaticality of those examples (AmE speaker), w.r.t. being standard English. Perhaps they are okay to BrE ears? – F.E. Nov 27 '14 at 17:15
  • 1
    That first sentence makes no sense to me (AmE) – Paul Senzee Jan 27 '15 at 3:15
  • 1
    Note that "the internet" is not an authority on grammar. – snailboat Feb 25 '15 at 20:06
2

No, you are not right.

First, there is no rule that changes word order to 'keep its balance'. If you know otherwise, please show it to me.

English sentences are grammatical, not 'balanced'.

Consider:

4 Over the river through the woods across the mountain beside the plane near the ford by the brook along the highway near the lake lived a mouse.

Second, long direct objects may go with long object complements:

5 The judges will announce the winner of this year's County Fair established in 1919 and held every year except from 1941-45 whoever brought the red velvet cake

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.