16

What would be a good collocation to emphasize the absence of something. A 'strong absence' sounds a bit oxymoronic to me.

I want to talk about the absence of certain important aspects in someone's critique of something. Sorry, the context is kind of complex. I think 'striking' may do

  • 'Flash new nightclub, on its opening night… with a ___ absence of customers' would be a suitable case. edit 'notable' springs to mind, as does 'noticeable' or if you were a reporter, wanting to turn the screw, 'distinguished' would hammer it home. – gone fishin' again. Nov 29 '14 at 21:42
  • 1
    "Striking" sounds fine to me. – Tyler James Young Nov 29 '14 at 21:51
  • 6
    I go for "conspicuous absence" myself. – hobbs Nov 29 '14 at 22:20
  • 2
  • 1
    "gaping absence", "yawning absense"? – Vi. Nov 30 '14 at 12:43
20

"Marked absence" maybe? "striking" as suggested above also seems to work. "Complete" absence seems good for situations where there's a continuum from present to absence ("Complete absence of calories") but less so for say whether an extroverted friend comes to a party ("strong presence") or not ("marked absence").

| improve this answer | |
  • 2
    I'd go with "marked absence," but keep in mind that the pronunciation here is not the same as you might expect; /ˈmɑːkɪd/ (like "markid") rather than /mɑːkt/ (like "markt"). – Eric Nov 30 '14 at 23:58
  • It may be my American (Californian) accent, but I have always pronounced it the latter way ("markt") and not made a distinction. – Michael Scott Cuthbert Dec 1 '14 at 8:10
  • 1
    I don't remember ever hearing anyone say /ˈmɑːkɪd/ in this context. I'm neither American nor British, but I'd say /mɑːkt/ every time. – Dawood ibn Kareem Dec 1 '14 at 8:57
  • 1
    I've always heard it as /ˈmɑːkɪd/ when used as an adjective. If someone said "/mɑːkt/ absence", I'd think they lost grades in class due to being absent. – Eric Dec 1 '14 at 16:45
16

The first thing coming to mind after complete absence was conspicuous absence, and Google ngrams seems to support my instinct that it is more common than other solutions (besides "complete"):

enter image description here

Though "complete" is more common, it seems to me that it is also more neutral.

If I wanted to emphasize the obviousness or strikingness of an absence, I would use "conspicuous." "Marked" and "noticeable" could be considered of the same flavor.

If I wanted to emphasize the completeness of an absence, I would pick "complete" or "total," or even "utter."

| improve this answer | |
8

A "complete absence" sounds natural to my (American) ear.

| improve this answer | |
7

A noticeable absence also works.

| improve this answer | |
4

I have seen the phrase "A palpable absence" used in various contexts. It is somewhat figurative, since the literal meaning of palpable is "able to be touched or felt".

| improve this answer | |
3

A sound can be weakly or strongly present, but it can only be absent in one way.

'Strongly present' describes the sound; if there is no sound, I think you need to be describing people's reaction to the lack of sound, or the remaining scene.

In my example, the silence isn't strong, but it might be remarkable, or enveloping, or notable or surprising or unexpected or unbelievable or unbroken or all-encompassing.

Geoff had a strong presence; the group strongly felt his absence.

Company A put in a strong presence at the trade show, Company B was totally absent.

| improve this answer | |
1

Glaring.

A glaring absence.

It sounds natural to me, though Google doesn't return that many results.

| improve this answer | |
0

How about... A telling absence? The word 'absence' already has some impact when used in a narrative. Remarking on the absence of someone or something offers a wealth of meaning, don't you think? So, the absence may be telling, noticeable, significant, marked, so on and so forth.

| improve this answer | |

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.