"The town's inhabitants/ residents." Is there a difference when used in this kind of sense?

closed as off-topic by ColleenV, user3169, FumbleFingers, Dinusha, Maulik V Dec 15 '14 at 6:37

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question should include more details than have been provided here. Please edit to add the research you have done in your efforts to answer the question, or provide more context. See: Details, Please." – ColleenV, user3169, FumbleFingers, Dinusha, Maulik V
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 1
    context provided by the OP is sufficient – Leo Dec 15 '14 at 10:10

As Jasper says, the term resident confers a notion of right (not necessarily a legal right, but that most easily fits), that inhabitant does not necessarily imply.

Both can be used in that phrase you supplied - but one may be preferable over the other -depending upon the actual subject, or topic, of discussion.


"Resident", "citizen", "tenant", "occupant", "householder", and "subject" all have legal meanings. I do not know whether "inhabitant" has a specific legal meaning.

Similarly, "residence", "domicile", "tenancy", "leasehold", and "occupancy" all have legal meanings.


I think it would be more idiomatic if you write "residents of the town" and "inhabitants of the town".

I looked up both on google and saw the usage of "residents of the town" is much more common than "inhabitants of the town" in this sense.

I think two word inhabitant sounds a little bit formal and maybe scientific sometimes.

And another difference between them in terms of usage is that, while the word inhabitant can be used for animals and humans, the word resident only can be used for humans.

Hope this helps a bit

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.