Source: Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company [1892], judgement of Bowen LJ

A further argument for the defendants was that this was a nudum pactum - that there was no consideration for the promise — that taking the influenza was only a condition, and that the using the smoke ball was only a condition, and that there was no consideration at all; in fact, that there was no request, express or implied, to use the smoke ball. Now, I will not enter into an elaborate discussion upon the law as to requests in this kind of contracts. I will simply refer to Victors v Davies[8] and Serjeant Manning's note to Fisher v Pyne,[9] which everybody ought to read who wishes to embark in this controversy. The short answer, to abstain from academical discussion, is, it seems to me, that there is here a request to use involved in the offer.

'this controversy' isn't physical, so why in? Should the preposition be on/upon instead?

  • An ngram search will show that embark in was common in the mid 19th century, and thereafter began to decline. Around 1910, embark on and embark upon began to overtake it. – Tᴚoɯɐuo Dec 17 '14 at 11:51
  • books.google.com/ngrams/… – Tᴚoɯɐuo Dec 17 '14 at 11:51
  • 2
    Why should "in" be more 'physical' than "upon" or "on"? You can engage in a discussion. (Not my downvote, BTW. Not this time, anyway.) – Tᴚoɯɐuo Dec 17 '14 at 12:06

In the end it does not really make too much of a difference, but I would think "in" would be right here. This is because a controversy, in this context is seen as a argument or debate. You have to be "in" the argument, not on or upon it.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.