Apart in phrases like "current English usage," what is the difference between usage, and use (the noun)?

Should I say, for example, "the usage of chemical weapons" or "the use of chemical weapons"?

The reason I am asking is that the equivalent Italian words are exchangeable, and I don't understand if the same is true for the English words.

  • kiam, I'm not sure, but I think usage is for utilizzazione and use is for uso. Please, tell me your opinion.
    – user114
    Mar 25, 2013 at 15:10
  • @Carlo_R. It could also be utilizzo, and uso. The problem is that in Italian there isn't such distinction as in English.
    – apaderno
    Mar 25, 2013 at 15:32

1 Answer 1


The short answer is that they are very similar, but not exactly the same.

In fact, if you were to look them up in the dictionary (links provided below), you would find that they have very overlapping definitions and might seem to be complete synonyms. However, there is a rather subtle difference in how they are used in every day conversation, with each of them generally favoring one of the two common definitions over the other one.

Usage tends to refer to the proper way to use something, or perhaps more generally, it is said when discussing how to use something, properly or improperly.
Merriam-Webster defines it as "1. firmly established and generally accepted practice or procedure; 2. the action, amount, or mode of using."

Use tends to be more general; it usually refers simply to the act of using something, outside of a discussion of proper or improper usage.
Merriam-Webster defines it as "1. the act or practice of employing something; 2. habitual or customary usage." (There are others as well.)

For example, in the sample sentence you gave, "The usage of chemical weapons" sounds like the beginning of a sentence on how to use them, such as "The usage of chemical weapons is a very dangerous topic.", whereas "The use of chemical weapons" sounds like a phrase from a political discussion, such as "The use of chemical weapons in this manner is a crime against humanity."

If you were to say "The usage of chemical weapons in this manner is a crime against humanity," it would sound like you were critiquing their form, rather than saying that the act of using them is itself wrong.

I hope that makes sense. These are not hard, fast rules, and, like everything in language, there is some overlap in meaning.

In summary, usage refers to how something is used, and use refers to the act of using it.

  • Ken, could "usage" have acquired the meaning of "approved use"? If so, probably "usage refers to how something should be used" is better than "usage refers to how something is used".
    – user114
    Mar 25, 2013 at 21:50
  • 1
    It certainly can be used that way. When I say "how something is used", I'm referring in a very general sense to a discussion regarding how to use it, how not to use it, good practice, bad practice, should, shouldn't, etc. It certainly doesn't only mean "approved use". Mar 27, 2013 at 11:03
  • Various examples of what the -age suffix can imply at reference.com: -age
    – nmclean
    Mar 3, 2014 at 13:56
  • -1 I don't find the distinction to be that common to be practicable as an answer for learners. Aug 11, 2016 at 23:09

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .