3

I want to state a salad that has many different kinds of vegetables, so can I say "a multi-vegetable salad"? I've looked up the meaning of the prefix "multi" in Oxford learner's dictionary http://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/salad and found some examples such as "multicoloured", "multi-ethnic society", "multimillionaire",... It says that "multi" can combine with nouns and adjectives but "multi-vegetable" still somehow seems funny to me. So is it right? If not, what is an appropriate word to describe this kind of salad?

6

native English speakers tend to use the phrase "mixed salad".

I realise the logic of your thinking but the phrase "multi-vegetable salad" would not be used.

  • 2
    multi-vegetable isn't wrong, it's just not used in native speak. "mixed salad" is definitely the way to go. – rickcnagy Jan 11 '15 at 16:55
6

I think your hunch is right; multi-vegetable salad sounds a bit odd.

This might be why: the phrase sounds redundant because a salad has multiple vegetables almost by definition:

salad (n.) a dish, usually cold, of raw or sometimes cooked vegetables or fruits in various combinations, served with a dressing, or molded in gelatin, and sometimes with seafood, poultry, eggs, etc. added (from Collins; emphasis added)

salad (n.) a food containing a mixture of raw vegetables such as lettuce, tomatoes, and cucumbers, usually served with a salad dressing (from Macmillan; emphasis added)

salad (n.) a mixture of uncooked vegetables, usually including lettuce, eaten either as a separate dish or with other food (from Cambridge; emphasis added)

salad (n.) A food made primarily of a mixture of raw or cold ingredients, typically vegetables, usually served with a dressing such as vinegar or mayonnaise. (from Wiktionary; emphasis added)

salad (n.) food mixtures either arranged on a plate or tossed and served with a moist dressing; usually consisting of or including greens (from the Mnemonic Dictionary; emphasis added)

One could argue that, without the mix of vegetables, a bowl of lettuce is simply a bowl of lettuce, and not a salad (although I think such an argument would be a bit pedantic).


If not, what is an appropriate word to describe this kind of salad?

I think the word is salad. I checked the menus of a few restaurant chains here in the U.S., and when they want to give more details about a salad, they simply list the main ingredients:

enter image description here       enter image description here

Source: Applebee's (L); Red Robin (R)

Sometimes you'll see the phrase mixed greens (as in the description on the right); however, that refers to a blend of lettuces – possibly with other leafy greens.

If you want to emphasize that a salad has only vegetables (no egg or meat), you could use the descriptor vegetarian salad.

  • 3
    +1 Also, I think, attributive vegetable itself implies a variety: a salad which had only one vegetable ingredient would take the name of that vegetable. – StoneyB Jan 11 '15 at 12:21
3

The thing to understand about "Multi" is that it wasn't a commonly used affix until somewhat recently, (as Google shows here), long after the word salad came into usage.

As a result of "Multis" fairly recent rise in usage, there are a lot of terms that came about after the 1940s that use "multi" to show when we have several different objects creating one master object. For example a "multi-engine airplane" Is a plane who's power unit has more than one engine and, as you are probably aware, aviation terms were coming into usage vaguely at the same time "multi" was, hence people were aware of "multi" and could use it to clarify things.

The world "salad" on the other hand is a very old world (evidence from Google again). It started seeing a lot of usage in the last 1800s. Thus. because "salad" was a well established word that meant, more or less, "to mix a bunch of vegetables together for eating" there was really no need to add "multi-vegetable" in order to clarify the term. And people don't generally start adding an affix unless it's really needed to clarify an old term. Salad didn't have that need, so multi was never attached to it.

Sorry, probably a little off topic. But I thought explaining the etymology a bit would clarify why we don't use "multi" with a lot of words that could probably use it, but those words appeared before the 1930s so...we don't. Language is an organic thing, remember, it's not decided by a committee. Otherwise we probably would have all been forced to switch to "multi-vegatable salad" back in the 60s (rather than the 30 because, you know, committees take forever.... ;).)


It looks like the links I provided are causing some fits, so let me just include both graphs right here for easy reference :).

First, the graph for multi: Note the usage spike that starts around the 40s. enter image description here

Now, the graph for salad: Note a gentle introduction starting in the 1810s that hits critical mass in 1890/1900 or there abouts. enter image description here

Note: These graphs are provided by Google and, as I recall, are based off of searchable text at the Google Books site. This makes the stat man in me a bit squeamish, but I think the sample size is large enough to work for this discussion.

  • I'm not disagreeing with you, but I don't understand how your Google links support what you're saying about the usages of these words. – J.R. Jan 11 '15 at 21:15
  • @J.R. You may need to click the down arrow to open the full definition. At the bottom of the frame is a graph that shows word usage over the last 200 years (well, usage as found in searchable media which, I'll admit, makes the stats guy in me a little nervous. But I think it's still valid enough for this discussion.) – Jay Carr Jan 11 '15 at 21:17
  • Thanks! I see it now, but I had to switch browsers in order to see it. You might want to consider taking screen shots and posting them in your answers, in case anyone else has the same problem. (Just an idea, not a demand.) But at least now I know what you were getting at. :^) Nice research. – J.R. Jan 11 '15 at 21:26
  • Nah, good idea. Lemme get that together... – Jay Carr Jan 11 '15 at 21:27
  • @J.R. There you go :) – Jay Carr Jan 11 '15 at 21:32

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.