While conversing with my friend I got confused between these two sentences:

It depends upon the context.

It depends on context.

Which one is more apt in usage and why?

  • Sud, I would use "on", not "upon", because my book says that "depend" preferably takes "on" and because "upon" is justifiable when something occurs. However, according to other theories, you should use "from", not "on" nor "upon". But I cannot post an answer because I'm sure natives can say a lot of things on this matter :) – user114 Mar 28 '13 at 19:56
  • 3
    @Carlo_R.: I don't think we'd say, "It depends from context." From has a lot of meanings and usages, but that's not one of them. – J.R. Mar 28 '13 at 21:48
  • 1
    @J.R. Well, icicles depend from eaves . . . – StoneyB on hiatus Mar 28 '13 at 22:40

On and upon can be used interchangeably here. Both of the following sentences are correct:

It depends on context.

It depends upon context.

Both of these sentences mean that, in general, whatever "it" refers to will change based on whatever context it is in.

You add the when you're being more specific about what that context is:

It depends on the context of the situation.

It depends upon the context of the situation.

In this case we have specified which context (the context of the situation) so it requires the article.

In practice, all four sentences mean the same thing. Personally I'd be more likely to use the general "It depends on context" and the specific "It depends upon the context [insert description here]", but that's just personal use. Any of the above are perfectly acceptable.

| improve this answer | |

Both are valid, however as can be seen by the following Ngram, depends on context is much more commonly used in modern English than depends upon context, since about 1960:

Google ngram for depends on context versus depends upon context

| improve this answer | |
  • where can I generate these graphs? – Black Jack 21 Jun 8 at 7:11

On is a preposition unbounded by time. upon is a preposition that is bounded by time:

  1. On arrival at the station he should buy a sandwich - NB there is no time/date specified.

  2. Upon arrival he bought a sandwich - NB it is still a preposition, but we know the event has occurred, and hence that it was bounded by time.

There is a clear difference.

| improve this answer | |

On is more formal than upon, and the British National Corpus and the Corpus of Contemporary American English show it is more frequently used than upon in both British and American English. However, the difference in frequency is much greater in American English than in British English.

| improve this answer | |

where there is no action, we use "on" where there is an action we use upon for example The duster is on the table Bring the duster and keep it upon the table.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.