I know that I can say "such type of plants" instead of "such a type of plants", but why cannot I say "such person" instead of "such a person"?

Is there any reason for these two different usages of "such"?


I don't believe you can (correctly) say "such type of plants". I believe the difference is singular vs. plural. When you're using the singular (person, plant), include 'a': "Such a person", "Such a type of plants" (In this case 'type of plants' is a singular, the plural would be 'types of plants').

When the subject is plural, you leave out 'a': "Such people", "Such types of plants".

| improve this answer | |
  • Clear; much appreciated! I see. I was under a wrong impression that "such type" is a legitimate usage. :) – Megadeth Jan 16 '15 at 15:47
  • 1
    I agree. "Such type" does not sound correct. "Such a type" could be correct, but is not commonly used. – Nate Barbettini Jan 16 '15 at 16:44
  • I would interpret "such type of plants" to mean "such plants (of that type)", NOT "such a type of plants". – ignorantFid Mar 14 '15 at 17:39

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.