Usage example with a context:

All Wednesday, the road out of Debaltseve into government-held territory thundered to the sound of retreating armour - tanks and troop carriers full of exhausted, sometimes defiant soldiers.

In a bus by the side of the road, I found one Yuri slumped on his seat, across the aisle from a sleeping colleague.

He said the situation had become increasingly dire and individual units had taken their own decisions to leave. They were running out of ammunition and in danger of being surrounded, he told me.

Could you please tell me more about the usage of this type of grammatical construction (when you have a person's name and the word one as a quantifier before it)?

  • In such contexts, it's an idiomatic usage approximately implying a man (previously unmentioned, whose name happened to be Yuri, but that's not really important here). – FumbleFingers Reinstate Monica Feb 19 '15 at 22:33

"One Yuri" means

"a certain Yuri" or

"a certain person named Yuri" or

"a Yuri"

In other words one is being used like a or an and is used to make an indefinite reference to the person. We might make an indefinite reference because we have never met the person before, and we basically know nothing else about him except his name. An example of this is if a guy named Yuri calls your house and asks to speak to, say, your brother. If you do not know who this Yuri is, and perhaps you also do not think your brother knows, you could say to your brother,

There is one Yuri on the phone for you.

This is very much like saying a Yuri as far as being an indefinite reference.

Even though it is an indefinite reference it is a specific reference. We are referring to this specific person. The specific person on the phone, in this example; or the specific Yuri found slumped in his seat, in the case of the article you cite.

In certain cases, an author will make an indefinite reference to someone because the author feels a more detailed identification is not necessary or desirable for the narrative at hand. For example, the reporter of this story may feel that to identify this Yuri in more detail, such as providing his surname, could put this "one Yuri" at risk of danger, given the volatile context.

There could be other times when a more exact identification of this "one Yuri" is not important to the story, even when the person Yuri himself is important to the story.

| improve this answer | |
  • The explanation is slightly misleading. The guy is a prominent feature. His name and identity are not – blgt Feb 19 '15 at 10:02

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.