-1

He was considered by many the greatest of all Arab poets but his own arrogant self-regard for his abilities did not endear him to other writers and they looked for a source for his verse. Just as there were collections detailing every possible rhetorical figure used in literature emerged as well as how to write guides.

A. looked for a source for his verse

Firstly, I cannot get what is the relation between this sentence--A-- and its previous sentence--his own arrogant self-regard for his abilities did not endear him to other writers and they.

...................................................

B. Just as there were collections detailing every possible rhetorical figure used in literature emerged as well as how to write guides.

First off, would you show me which phrase(s) this conector as well as connects together?

What is more, I really cannot get the concept of the sentence--B.

  • Honestly, these sentences doesn't make much sense... could you post the source information? Are these sentences actually consecutive in the source material? If not, you probably want to make this two questions. – Catija Feb 23 '15 at 8:04
  • 1
    The current version of this page on Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arabic_literature#Literary_criticism does not actually contain part B of your quote. Please be sure to cite your sources! – Catija Feb 23 '15 at 8:13
  • It's better to wait until OP provides with some more info - source or whatever necessary or those what @Catija asked for that is. – Man_From_India Feb 23 '15 at 14:13
2

Context helps quite a bit for this question. The full paragraph reads (to a slightly broader degree:

Plagiarism also became a significant idea exercising the critics' concerns. The works of al-Mutanabbi were particularly studied with this concern. He was considered by many the greatest of all Arab poets but his own arrogant self-regard for his abilities did not endear him to other writers and they looked for a source for his verse.

This is talking about plagiarism. What it seems to be implying is that al-Mutanabbi was such an arrogant person about his own abilities that the other writers possibly disliked him and wanted to find proof that he hadn't actually written the poetry he claimed to have written. So, looked for a source for his work means they were researching old texts trying to find the poems he claimed to have written.

This is the equivalent of a modern professor Googling the content of an essay you turn in to check if you actually wrote it yourself or copied it from some other source.


Part B actually appears to be quite different on the Wikipedia page than what you quote:

Just as there were collections of facts written about many different subjects, numerous collections detailing every possible rhetorical figure used in literature emerged as well as how to write guides.

This, I think, is just a poorly written, overcomplicated example of why Wikipedia isn't the best source for serious research.

This sentence starts by saying:

Collections of facts were written about many different subjects.

This is just a simple statement. It may not even relate to Arabic Literature alone... there are thousands of reference books out there on many topics. This can honestly probably be removed from the sentence.

In the rest of the sentence, the sentence lists a couple of types of collections of fact that relate to the subject of the article:

Collections about rhetorical figures used in literature

Guides about how to write in this style.

The problem with this sentence is that emerged got plopped in a very ... nonsensical spot.

Emerged is the verb here. The word choice is used appropriately but the placement is very unusual. as well as is transitively tying emerged to both of the parts of the statement:

  • Collections about rhetorical figures used in literature emerged.

  • How-to-write guides emerged.

The definition of emerged being used here is:

to become known or apparent

Though, in this case, it could possibly have the meaning came into common use or came into existence.

I've been attempting to rewrite the sentence and failing because the meaning of the sentence is not clear, so rewriting it has a tendency to change its meaning.

  • Thank you so much, I am, however, still wondering what "emerge" is here? – nima Feb 23 '15 at 19:26
  • 1
    @nima Ok, I've restructured the second part and included a section on emerge. – Catija Feb 23 '15 at 20:10

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.