I've not seen;
'I', I said,....
often. Is it OK? Does anyone have any examples? ('She', she shouted, 'goes to Hell')
English Language Learners Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for speakers of other languages learning English. It only takes a minute to sign up.Sign up to join this community
There's nothing wrong with that construct, and nothing in English forbids it.
Of course, if you think it is awkward to read, see, or hear, you could change the wording easily enough:
"I," I said, "am not amused."
"I am not amused," I said.
I said, "I am not amused."
I said that I wasn't amused.
I think your wording might be effective, though, if the speaker is putting heavy emphasis on the leading pronoun. Let's say that a volleyball coach is kicking one of her players off the team. If I write:
"She is off the team," she said.
that sounds like a relatively flat statement. However, if I write it like this:
"She," she said, "is off the team."
that makes it seem like heavy emphasis was put on that first she. Perhaps the coach said that one word louder than the rest of the sentence, or with strong emotion. Perhaps she was pointing at the player as she said it. Or maybe she put a long pause after the word "she" for dramatic effect. In such cases, the second wording might be preferred, because that is how it seems to read when the leading pronoun is set apart from the rest of the quote.
If it was a male coach, or a woman coaching a men's team, we'd have no question about these:
"She," he said, "is off the team."
"He," she said, "is off the team."
The rules of grammar don't change just because the two pronouns happen to be the same – although there's no harm in at least considering if a rephrasing would constitute an improvement.