1

Although the prime minister has made it a hallmark of his government to give MPs the opportunity to debate and vote on proposed military missions, parliamentary consent is not actually required to deploy Canadian troops. That authority rests exclusively with the executive, which excises it on behalf of the Crown.

(ISIS mission: Andrew Doiron's colleagues recovering from friendly fire incident CBC News Mar 20, 2015)

I looked up the dictionary, but the word still doesn't make sense here. Is this a typo or does it have other meaning than 'to cut out'/'to impose a fee'? Thank you.

  • 1
    Looks to me like it’s supposed to be “exercises”. – Tyler James Young Mar 20 '15 at 19:46
  • @ Tyler James Young Thank you. One answer from a native speaker is enough. I guess someone will suggest closing my post again. Sorry, I just had to make sure. I don't mind closing my post this time. – whitecap Mar 20 '15 at 19:56
2

Whitecap, you should congratulate yourself on your intuition for English: indeed "excise" is a typographical error in the example passage.

By the way, native speakers frequently run into this same problem: they come across a passage where a word appears to be used wrongly, but they're not sure if it's just being used in a way they're not familiar with, or if the passage assumes they know some fact they're ignorant of. What a native speaker—and you—can do in a case like this is look up basic information about the topic. This is often much better information than is available in a general reference such as a dictionary. Of course, sometimes it's hard to know what information to look up, and usually the fastest method is to ask someone who's already familiar with the topic.

I'm a native American English speaker, but I've read a little about Westminster parliamentarism, so I can give you a brief explanation which provides some strong evidence that "excises" is a typo in the passage you found.

Quick explanation of Canadian government

In Canada, as in all nations that share the British Crown (that is, all nations that now have Queen Elizabeth II as their monarch), the Crown officially owns all the powers of government. That is, only the monarch has the authority to pass laws, to tax, to declare war, to hold elections, etc. However, by custom, the monarch only acts on advice officially received from her ministers, called "the government", who are elected by parliament. The members of parliament ("MPs") are chosen by democratic elections, and in practice the monarch plays a ceremonial role and sometimes helps opposing political factions work out compromises.

In the example passage, "the executive" refers to the government. Parliament as a whole, including members opposed to the government, regularly debate the government's policies, and at any moment can pass a motion of no confidence to remove the government from power, forcing the monarch to choose a new government (usually by holding elections).

In other words, the theory of Canadian government is that the monarch officially holds all legal authority but appoints a democratically elected executive government to exercise that authority on the monarch's behalf.

  • @sumelic Ha!! I've been wondering when I would make either that mistake or just "Native American". Thanks, I'll fix it right now. – Ben Kovitz Mar 21 '15 at 18:59

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.