The following quote from "The sorcery code" by DimaZales:

Blaise was sitting in his study writing code.

lacks either the definite article or the indefinite article.

I wonder why? Is there anything I'm missing? Is the gerund that can take a direct object without the article?

  • 2
    Why do you think it needs an article? If you were writing poetry or writing prose there's no article. "Code" in this use, is the same as poetry. It's a type or style of writing. – Catija Apr 23 '15 at 23:09
  • Thank you @Catija! However was hard to figure it out. – Lucian Sava Apr 23 '15 at 23:27
  • Judging from the title, I believe that this code Blaise was writing is similar to programmer's code. Programmers write code, not a code. (It's kind of similar to work, not a work, in most contexts.) To refer to a piece of code (in programming context), it's better to say a piece of code, imho. See also: nerdland.net/2010/06/code-mass-noun-versus-count-noun. – Damkerng T. Apr 24 '15 at 0:22

Code, when it means computer programming, is a non-count noun, so it doesn't need an indefinite article.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.