2

What's the difference between the two? Is one of the ungrammatical? Example:

At first I thought he was the victim. Then I realized that, no, the only one fooled was me.

At first I thought he was the victim. Then I realized that, no, the only one being fooled was me.

  • 2
    What is your reason/thinking for adding "being"? More context and an idea of the timeframe are really needed to decide. – user3169 Apr 26 '15 at 3:32
6

Neither of them is ungrammatical. It just depends on what the situation is.

At first I thought he was the victim. Then I realized that, no, the only one fooled was me.

This sentence means that this has happened in the past.

At first I thought he was the victim. Then I realized that, no, the only one being fooled was me.

"Being" indicates the situation is still happening right now. (Definition of "being": the fact of existing)

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.