Three statements:

  1. It weighs about a pound.

about = adjective or preposition??

'about' here adds information to the noun 'pound'. Therefore I believe it should be an adjective. But in regular sentences, 'about' functions either as a preposition or an adverb. So, what is it here?

  1. He was only a yard off me.

I believe 'only' is an adjective because it adds information to the noun 'yard'. Am I thinking right?

'off' is a preposition in my opinion as it relates 'me' to the rest of the sentence.

  1. I will watch while you sleep.

What is 'while' here?

Additional & useful discussion on the first sentence: English Language & Usage

  • 1
    In (1); I think 'about' is an adverb! in (2), only is again an adverb; off is preposition – Maulik V May 8 '15 at 7:02
  • We don't answer proofreading questions on this site. If you have a question about a specific sentence that you think might be wrong, and you can explain what about the sentence seems wrong, then you're more likely to get useful answers. – James May 8 '15 at 7:24
  • @DJMcMayhem Thanks for pointing out; it's not proofreading... I've corrected it now. I just want to find out the parts of speech in the sentences. – Phoenix May 8 '15 at 8:02
  • 4
    This may not be "proofreading", but it still seems like "homework help." You're asking us to "confirm or correct," and you're not really putting any research into it. Consider #2. You recognize the pronouns, but you're having trouble with only and off. This would be a better question if you wrote one question that focused on those two words, instead of combining three questions that ask us to tell you if you're correct about everything. It would be nice, too, if you told us your line of thinking: "The word 'only' seems like an adjective because... but it could also be adverb because..." – J.R. May 8 '15 at 9:24
  • Thanks for explaining how I should present a question. Made edits. – Phoenix May 9 '15 at 15:36

It weighs about a pound. 

After considering the discussion of this phrasing on English Language & Usage, I've changed my mind.  The "about" in "about a pound" is an adverb. 

Ordinarily, "a" or "an" is the indefinite article.  However, in this case, it is an ordinary determiner.  It's a synonym for "one". 

In this sentence, the phrase "about a pound" or "about one pound" is a noun phrase.  The word "about" modifies the word "a" or "one".  This modified determiner in turn modifies the noun "pound". 

When I first approached this sentence, I simply assumed that "a" was the indefinite article and that, as such, it wasn't an available to take an adverb as a modifier.  Under that assumption, it's easy enough to show that "about" does not modify the verb, the pronoun, or the noun.  Replacing "a" with a more explicit number does leave us with something that an adverb can modify.  If the grammar of "about five pounds", "about twenty pounds" and "about a hundred pounds" is the same as the grammar of "about a pound", then it makes sense to consider this instance of "about" to be an adverb. 


He was only a yard off me. 

In this sentence, the word "only" is an adverb.  It modifies the verb "was".  English allows fairly flexible placement of those adverbs which modifiy verbs:  "He only was a yard off me", "he was only a yard off me" and "he was a yard off me only" display this flexibility. 

The word "off" is a preposition.  The object of this preposition is the pronoun "me".  This prepositional phrase modifies the noun phrase "a yard". 


I will watch while you sleep. 

In this sentence, "you sleep" is a complete clause.  The subject is "you".  The verb is "sleep", which employs the active voice, present tense, indefinite aspect and indicative mode.  It's not the only clause in the sentence.  There is also a clause with "I" as the subject and "will watch" as the active voice, future tense, indefinite aspect verb. 

The word which connects these two clauses is "while". 

The phrase "while you sleep" modifies the verb of the matrix clause, making "you sleep" a subordinate clause.  A word which connects a subordinate clause to a matrix clause is a subordinating conjunction.

| improve this answer | |
  • You were right in analyzing the first sentence only. From then on it was completely wrong. Though your analysis of last sentence is correct in traditional grammar, it's not in modern grammar. And as for your analysis of second sentence, it's not correct in any form of grammar. – Man_From_India Sep 24 '16 at 6:11
  • You could analyze only in the second sentence exactly like the only in your first sentence. The only in your second sentence is not modifying the linking verb - was. It's an adverb, that is modifying the determinitive - a. – Man_From_India Sep 24 '16 at 6:13
  • He was only a yard off me. You are right that off is a preposition here. off me is a Preposition Phrase (PP). Only a yard is a Noun Phrase (NP). The PP here take a NP as a modifier here. So the locative complement of the sentence is in the form of NP + PP - [only a yard] [off me]. – Man_From_India Sep 24 '16 at 6:15
  • In your analysis of the second, how do you explain the flexibility of placement? Do you assume that "he only was a yard off", "he was only a yard off" and "he was a yard off only" show different grammatical or semantic relationships, in the way that "it about weighs a pound", "it weighs about a pound" and "it ways a pound about" are all distinct? To my native-speaking ear, those three placements of "only" all sound natural, but only the one placement of "about" does. So, no, they cannot be analyzed the same. – Gary Botnovcan Sep 24 '16 at 21:23

Without the word "about", the sentence is simple:

It weighs a pound.

That's a pronoun, a verb, and a noun phrase acting as a subject, a transitive verb, and a direct object.

Even with the word "about", much of the grammar of the sentence remains the same:

It weighs about a pound.

"It" remains the subject, "weighs" remains a transitive verb, and the phrase "about a pound" might still be the direct object.

I think we can immediate discount the possibilities that this "about" is a noun, verb, conjunction or interjection.  We only need to examine the preposition, the adjective and the adverb as reasonable possibilities.  

The word "about" is often a preposition, and "about a pound" could be a prepositional phrase.  If it is, we should be able to find other prepositional phrases which fit this sentence pattern.

We learned early American history.
We learned about the pilgrims.

I cleaned the floor.
I cleaned under the bed.

There is a clear general pattern here, and there are at least two ways to explain it.  One obvious explanation is that prepositional phrases can be direct objects.  Another explanation is that prepositional phrases can modify the intransitive use of a normally transitive verb.  In either case, the pattern Subject / Verb / Prepositional Phrase make sense.

This is reasonable evidence for the "about" in question being a preposition.  

If it is an ordinary adjective, it would appear after the definite article: "an about pound".  If it modifies "a pound" at all, it must be a predeterminer.  Unfortunately, I don't see how to distinguish between this possibility and the possibility that it is a preposition.

Instead, I'll rely on Oxford Dictionaries.  That source lists only preposition and adverb as possible grammatical categories.  In contrast, its listing for all does include the category predeterminer.

Either Oxford Dictionaries is mistaken, or the word "about" is not a predeterminer.  

If it is an adverb, then it must modify the verb.  There is no other word in this sentence that an adverb could modify.  If so, we should be free to change its placement:

It about weighs a pound. (x)
It weighs about a pound.
It weighs a pound about. (x)

In comparison:

It only weighs a pound.
It weighs only a pound.
It weighs a pound only.

This is sufficient reason to claim that the "about" in question is not an adverb. 

In the sentence "It weighs about a pound", "about" is a preposition and "a pound" is that preposition's object.

| improve this answer | |
  • This is a very interesting approach, but went it awry early on. "Weighs" is intransitive. – Adam May 19 '15 at 21:18
  • If so, then what part of the sentence is "a pound" in "it weighs a pound"? I toyed with the idea that "to weigh" might have a copular sense, but that idea fell apart. "It" and "a pound" have completely separate referents. – Gary Botnovcan May 19 '15 at 21:28
  • Weighs is a verb. Pound is an adverbial noun modifying weighs. About is an adverb modifying pound. – Adam May 19 '15 at 21:36
  • I'd accept that as a valid alternate interpretation except for one thing. An adverb or adverbial noun acts as an adjunct. We should be able to drop it and still have a good sentence with an intransitive verb: He waited an hour -> He waited. It weighs a pound -> It weighs. It makes little sense to claim that something is an adjunct when the sentence fails without it. – Gary Botnovcan May 19 '15 at 21:56
  • Ah, but now you have me wondering whether "a pound" is an attributive noun acting as a predicate adjectival subject complement for a copular "weighs". Even if so, the "about" in question remains a preposition. – Gary Botnovcan May 19 '15 at 22:52

about in 'It weighs about a pound' indicates that the weight of 'it' is close to a pound. it shows nearness. Hence it is a preposition.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.