1

Please explain the difference between was not and did not in my below example.

No, ball was not hit the stumps.

Or

No, ball did not hit the stumps.

1

Your first example, as is, is ungrammatical:

No, ball was not hit the stumps.

The verb was shows that the ball underwent (or not, because of the negation in your case) the action of someone or something. To make it grammatical the action verb hit should be followed by the preposition by:

No, the ball was not hit by his foot.

No, the ball was not hit by the bat.

Your second example is also ungrammatical because it lacks the definite article the.

No, ball did not hit the stumps.

To make it grammatical we should add the definite article the:

No, the ball did not hit the stumps.

So the second example shows the ball as the doer of the action.

0

No, the ball didn't hit the stumps.

The sentence is in the active voice and grammatically correct.

If you change it into the passive voice, the sentence will be:

No, the stumps were not hit by the ball.

The sentence "No, the ball was not hit the stumps is incorrect grammatically; it's neither in the active voice nor in the passive voice.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.