2

The "run-of-the-mill" (average or ordinary / etymologyy) entry on Merriam-Webster Learner's Dictionary contains a reference to "often disapproving". The "garden-variety" (not unusual; ordinary or common / etymology) entry doesn't, but mentions "always used before a noun US". The latter can be found as a synonym of the former; and vice versa, but to a lesser extent.

Are those differences correct and generally acknowledged by the native speaker and are there further differences between "run-of-the-mill" and "garden-variety" I should be aware of (intensity, usage, register, categories of objects it can relate to etc.)?

Improve this question
  • 5
    I would say that "run-of-the-mill" is not necessarily disapproving, but it does imply no better than average, and possibly worse than average quality. "Garden-variety", however, implies only that the item is of a type commonly/easily found. You might want to also compare "dime a dozen", which connotes cheapness as well as easy availability; or "plain vanilla", which means unadorned and unmodified—the standard edition. – Brian Hitchcock May 20 '15 at 5:46
  • 1
    Run-of-the-mill definitely suggests humdrum (dullness), whereas garden variety does not. – user6951 May 20 '15 at 14:54
2

The main difference as you suggested is the tone associated with the phrases. "run-of-the-mill" definitely suggests a more dull, negative tone than "garden-variety" does. However, I have seen Americans use them interchangeably, whether it was on purpose or just because of ignorance I do not know. Eg: The novel I read was a run-of-the-mill detective thriller. (versus) This garden-variety dress robe would blend in with any decor.

Improve this answer

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy