1

Can I use the word "strand" to mean a "sort" of a "kind" of something,
as in:

Multiple books of all strands have been written on the issue?

If not, what would be a good alternative?

0

4 Answers 4

1

One could argue that it would be understood but it may not be accepted since it's not idiomatic.

Other options:

  • types
  • kinds
  • sorts
  • flavors
  • ilks
  • forms
  • styles
  • varieties

If you want to be more specific, then be more specific. Don't just make up a term and expect it to imply what you're trying to say.

Multiple books with differing opinions, motivations, and ideologies have been written on the issue.

9
  • I mean by strands different opinions, different motivations, and ideologies. i wonder it could be used given that addition.
    – asef
    Commented Jun 2, 2015 at 7:43
  • @asef There's no inherent meaning of "strands" to imply those things... can you explain why you think it does?
    – Catija
    Commented Jun 2, 2015 at 7:44
  • It sounds to my ear that might be used to convey the notion of things coming from all shores, but I am not sure.
    – asef
    Commented Jun 2, 2015 at 7:51
  • Perhaps as in "all walks of life"
    – asef
    Commented Jun 2, 2015 at 7:54
  • What does "strand" have to do with "walks of life"? I'm sorry but it has no inherent meaning like what you're trying to force into it and your intention will not be conveyed unless you go with something like the more specific option I listed above.
    – Catija
    Commented Jun 2, 2015 at 7:56
1

The ODO defines the noun strand as "An element that forms part of a complex whole." definition 1.2 of the noun.

This is an extension of the meaning of 1.0: "A single thin length of something such as thread, fiber, or wire, especially as twisted together with others [my emphasis]."

So if I go outside and yank some grass up, I'm likely to end up with not only grass but maybe some weed(s), and/or a flower. So, in a limited manner, I'll have plants of all strands in my hand. And although I will also gave plants of all types/kinds, the meaning is not the same.

Strands are part of a complex whole (1.2). Types and kinds do not have this meaning.

Synonyms for strand include:

element, component, factor, ingredient, aspect, feature, strain

There are example sentences with strand in the ODO and other dictionaries that you can look at and learn from. After examining these sentences and you feel that your original sentence works, then go for it.

You could perhaps also say something such as:

Multiple books by authors of all strands (or: every strand) of thought have been written on the issue.

People come from all strands of life, and often authors write from all strands of thought. In this sense, they are each a part of the complex whole.

And even though people of all kinds probably include people of all strands, the two terms are not the same. This answer has attempted to show why.

If this is not what you want, you probably want to go with one of the synonyms for types that other answers have listed.

0
0

I personally have never heard of the expression of all strands. You could, however, use of all kinds to say what you mean:

  • Multiple books of all kinds...

Or something like this:

  • Multiple books of different types...
1
  • I mean by strands different opinions, different motivations, and ideologies. i wonder it could be used given that addition
    – asef
    Commented Jun 2, 2015 at 7:43
0

"Strand" might be possible here but I don't think it would be usual or the best choice. There are many possible alternatives. "Types" or "kinds" are the ones I would use. There are probably better alternatives. I would also consider changing "multiple" to "many" "a great many" "a huge number" or something similar.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .