What is the difference between nude/naked?

As for me both has same meaning

Naked - (of a person or part of the body) without clothes.

Nude - wearing no clothes; naked.

How to use these words separately?

  • 2
    Interesting question. There are some contexts where the words seem pretty much interchangable, and other contexts where I'd probably favor one over the other. I think nude is generally considered the more tasteful term, while naked is a more "raw" term, but I hope someone delves a little deeper than that in an answer.
    – J.R.
    Jun 4, 2015 at 10:06
  • Related: english.stackexchange.com/questions/106582/… Jun 4, 2015 at 10:33
  • Also note that a nude model is not always naked. Jun 4, 2015 at 10:36
  • 1
  • 1
    'Learning' has no limits! @AmD
    – Maulik V
    Jun 5, 2015 at 7:00

4 Answers 4


I think it was Robert Heinlein who said, "Nude is sexy. Naked is defenseless."

This is one of those cases where dictionary definitions of the two words might well be the same, but there are subtle differences in shades of meaning.

As others have noted, we generally use "nude" to refer to art. It's generally used to refer to lack of clothing in a "positive" sense: artistic or sexy. "Nude models", a "nude scene" in a movie, "nude beaches", etc.

"Naked" is usually used to refer to lack of clothing in a "negative" sense: defenseless, embarrassing, exposed. "Caught naked", "naked and helpless", "the prisoner was stripped naked", etc.

Also, "nude" is, I think, exclusively used for human bodies, while "naked" can be used in many contexts. You can say "the naked blade of a knife". No one says "the nude blade of a knife". Or, "When he realized the danger he felt raw and naked terror." No one would say "... nude terror".

  • Getting naked for the doctor or even getting naked with a lover is not negative, yet you wouldn't use nude in those cases...
    – oerkelens
    Jun 5, 2015 at 8:13
  • 1
    Naked for a doctor: Yes, "negative" and "positive" probably weren't the right words; I was groping for the right words. (No pun intended on "groping" in this context.) Presumably you're not trying to be sexy for the doctor. You're being exposed, visible, so that he can diagnose your ills.
    – Jay
    Jun 5, 2015 at 13:18
  • Still, when I'm with a lover, she's probably naked, not nude. And I wouldn't mind if she tried to be sexy. It would be very different from the doctor-situation, but still, unless the doctor wants to paint me, or I the girl, I wouldn't use the word nude :) (and if the doctor wants to paint me I am not paying for the consult!)
    – oerkelens
    Jun 5, 2015 at 13:21
  • When I'm with a woman, she's usually wearing an overcoat and a chastity belt, but that's another story. Yes, you have a good point, that usage doesn't fit the thesis I was trying to build. I'm not prepared to abandon it entirely, but it needs refinement.
    – Jay
    Jun 5, 2015 at 13:25

This is purely in the context of a person who's either naked or nude (not naked eyes, truth etc.).

While both mean the same (as dictionaries suggest), I think 'naked' is a bit offensive as compared to 'nude'. Because in art colleges, they have 'nude' paintings.

Said that, if a girl is nude, maybe, the purpose could be artistic. But, if a girl is naked, probably you peeked through some hole! That is the reason that someone may pose nude, but never 'naked'.

Again, I repeat that both are interchangeable in many cases unless you want to stay totally clear.

  • 4
    "if a girl is naked, there's something horrible happening." Do you have any reference for that bold statement? I may have to warn a lot of people, you see. Doe sthis go for naked males as well? Because then I should personally make amends to my shower rituals...
    – oerkelens
    Jun 4, 2015 at 14:11
  • @oerkelens: Yeah, I've been known to do some quite (mutually!) enjoyable things with naked women :-)
    – jamesqf
    Jun 4, 2015 at 18:28
  • @oerkelens cannot find other example, intensity withdrawn though! What I mean is 'nude' is open, willingly done. Naked is a bit offensive, unbeknownst or unwillingly done. But that's looking through microscopic eyes as I already mentioned.
    – Maulik V
    Jun 5, 2015 at 6:36
  • If the doctor asks me to get undressed, I get naked, not nude. When I am with a lover, we may get naked, not nude. Both times are not offensive, certainly not unbeknownst and they are willingly done. To see a naked girl, most men don't have to peep through holes. There is nothing inherently bad about naked, there are plenty of completely normal situations where one get's naked. Waking up next to a nude girl sounds certainly less attractive than next to a naked girl... unless I'm an avid artist that wants to paint her.
    – oerkelens
    Jun 5, 2015 at 6:58
  • 1
    Certainly not. There are cases where they are certainly different, but I don;t think that naked is always negative. As I said, I'd rather wake up next to a naked girl than a nude one. Your assumption that there is something negative about naked seems too generalised. If anything, naked just means "uncovered", whereas nude has, indeed, symbolic or artistic implication. The absence of symbolism or art doesn't mean anything bad.
    – oerkelens
    Jun 5, 2015 at 8:12

OALD explains nude is mostly used in reference to art: a nude model, a nude painting, a nude photo.

  • Mostly yes, but certainly not exclusively.
    – Chenmunka
    Jun 4, 2015 at 14:29

Along with artistic, nude is also a legal term, which naked isn't. In most states, indecent exposure (nudity) laws pertain only to post pubertal persons.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .