0

I don't understand how to use much and more as a noun here.

Kimchi soup is a little more of a challenge.

Doing too much of anything is not good for anyone.

I'm familiar with situations where two of them is used as a modifier, but I don't know how to understand it here. Much and more is representing a part of challenge and anything? If that is the case, my opinion is that challenge and anything is too abstract that I refer to a part of them. How can I understand them?

1

my opinion is that 'challenge' and 'anything' are too abstract [so] that [I should not be able to] refer to a part of them

Has my interpolation correctly reflected what you were asking? Assuming it has:

Since much and more can be used nominally (as pronouns) and as adverbs, you have to discern the function the word is serving in a given phrase.

You can think of nominal much as a (large) portion of an unidentified or unspecified substance. A modifier is required to identify the nature of the substance, and this modifier is often expressed in the form of an of-phrase:

Is there much of that wine in your cellar?

Drinking too much of anything is a bad idea.

When the of-phrase refers to something that is not a substance, nominal much is being used figuratively:

Miso soup is not much of a challenge for western palates.

The noun in the of-phrase is being understood metaphorically as something having mass or dimension or size. But this usage is so second-nature that the metaphorical force is as faint as radiation from the Big Bang. The difficulty of the challenge is being expressed in faintly concrete terms.

Amount of substance <=> degree of difficulty

For most speakers, this would translate analogically, at a conscious level at least, to a statement of degree: "not very challenging".

Nominal more refers to a portion (of unknown size) of an unidentified substance, so that it, too, requires a modifier to identify the substance.

Do you have more of that wine in your cellar?
--Yes, I have a little more of it, only a few bottles.
--Yes, I have a good deal more of it, as the wine was on sale, so I bought a case of it.

Kimchi soup is more of a challenge to western palates.

The implication (from context) is that kimchi poses a greater challenge than other foods pose.

P.S.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.