When searching some sort of definitions on urban dictionary, I found a sentence; I'm confused by the phrasing on the website.

At the end of the movie, when Jerry expresses his love in a long-winded speech to Dorothy, Dorothy's reply was the simple phrase: "You had me at hello." Source

In this case, why is it worded like Dorothy's reply was the simple phrase instead of using is in it.

Shouldn't the first half of sentence and second half of sentence be consistent?

  • I would venture to say that the phrase "you had me at hello" has not entered the general vocabulary of the native English speaking population as "[a] phrase that expresses affection".
    – TimR
    Aug 11, 2015 at 18:33
  • 2
    @TRomano - The phrase may not be in your lexicon, but, like it or not, it has made a dent in the language, as is evidenced by this ngram, this modest handful of book titiles, and this wedding planning business. It's even used in marketing.
    – J.R.
    Aug 12, 2015 at 9:12
  • And more generally, snowcloned as You had me at X.
    – user230
    Dec 9, 2015 at 19:42

2 Answers 2


In my opinion, the sentence flows more smoothly with both verbs in the same tense. If you put that sentence on my desk to copy edit I would change it so both are in present tense.

In general, you shouldn't change tenses in a sentence unless you are actually trying to describe a shift in time. Since both actions (Jerry expressing his love, Dorothy's reply) occur in the same time frame, they should be in the same tense.

Purdue's OWL states it like this:

General guideline: Do not shift from one tense to another if the time frame for each action or state is the same. Source

This is more of a style issue than a strict grammar rule. As J.R. points out, you could interpret "When Jerry expresses his love" as clarifying the phrase "At the end of the movie." In that reading using Dorothy's reply was is probably fine.

Also, as a general rule, when talking about actions that occurred in a work of fiction, the present tense is used. There are exceptions, but I personally would put this sentence in the present tense.

  • 1
    I'd like to see you beef up this answer some. I have no problem with the original sentence, and insisting that it needs to be either expresses/is or expressed/was seems pedantic.
    – J.R.
    Aug 11, 2015 at 15:25
  • @J.R. You should add your own answer explaining that, as well, then. Aug 11, 2015 at 15:26
  • I'm not prepared to write an answer until I can substantiate it. This is more of an opinion than an answer, I think.
    – J.R.
    Aug 11, 2015 at 15:35
  • @J.R. Added some beef for you. I disagree that opinions aren't answers, but that's a different subject. Aug 11, 2015 at 15:41
  • When Jerry expresses his love could be a reference clarifying the first part of the sentence ("At the end of the movie..."). If that's the case, I'm not sure the advice from the OWL applies. At the end of the movie, when X happens, the protagonist reacted by.... Is that wrong? (It's a sincere question; I'm genuinely stumped here.) If it is wrong, it seems just like some minor grammatical carelessness, not a major grammatical faux pas, but something tells me that it might not even be wrong.
    – J.R.
    Aug 11, 2015 at 17:08

yes, there should be consistency. And both should be in the past tense.

"At the end of the movie, when Jerry expressed his love in a long-winded speech to Dorothy, Dorothy's reply was the simple phrase: you had me at hello."

It is likely a typo-error or lapse in the writer's mind.

  • Stories of novels or movies are also often told in present simple: "when Jerry expresses ... Dorothy's reply is ...". Either way, the tense needs to be consistent. (Note that OP wrote "when Jerry express ..." which is incorrect in any case.)
    – Sydney
    Aug 11, 2015 at 13:55
  • 1
    Are you sure? When a story is narrated by a third person, it is usually in the past, based on almost all the novels I've read.
    – shin
    Aug 11, 2015 at 14:11
  • Books and movies are often narrated in past tense. When writing about an event that occurs in a book or movie, present tense is very common. Aug 11, 2015 at 14:47
  • shin - I was unclear in my comment. As Aaron explained, I was really talking about someone summarising a story or movie.
    – Sydney
    Aug 11, 2015 at 22:43
  • @Sydney I agree that the present simple is fine here, but mixing the past and present simple is something that might happen in normal speech but would usually be edited out in writing.
    – Casey
    Dec 3, 2021 at 20:11

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .